Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30047068›Full record

SynthesisDrugs & aging2018

Pharmacological Interventions to Improve Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength and Physical Performance in Older People: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.

Anton De Spiegeleer, David Beckwée, Ivan Bautmans, Mirko Petrovic, Sarcopenia Guidelines Development group of the Belgian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics (BSGG)

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Sarcopenia among treated cancer patients before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality studies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Probiotics and muscle health: the impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Anton De SpiegeleerSection of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-2807
David BeckwéeRehabilitation Sciences Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ivan BautmansFrailty in Ageing Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Mirko PetrovicSection of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. mirko.petrovic@ugent.be.
Sarcopenia Guidelines Development group of the Belgian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics (BSGG)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEBritish Geriatrics Society · GBGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia, defined as the pathological decline in muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance with aging, has become one of the geriatric giants because of its increasing prevalence and devastating health effects. The Belgian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics (BSGG) is currently developing evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and therapy of sarcopenia for use in broad clinical practice. This systematic review summarizes the results of the Working Group on Pharmacology.

objectiveOur objective was to provide an evidence-based overview of the possible pharmacological interventions for sarcopenia with a focus on interventions that have already been studied in systematic reviews or meta-analyses.

methodsWe conducted a systematic umbrella review. Using the electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science, we identified systematic reviews and meta-analyses that assessed the effect of pharmacological interventions on criteria for sarcopenia in subjects aged ≥ 65 years. Study selection, quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers.

resultsWe identified seven systematic reviews or meta-analyses, encompassing ten pharmacological interventions: vitamin D, combined estrogen-progesterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, growth hormone, growth hormone-releasing hormone, combined testosterone-growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, pioglitazone, testosterone and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Importantly, very few systematic reviews or meta-analyses clearly mentioned baseline sarcopenia status. Therefore, our recommendations are generalised to older people, without specifying whether the muscle effect is more effective in healthy, pre-sarcopenic or sarcopenic older people. Vitamin D had a significant effect on muscle strength and physical performance, especially in women with low baseline values (< 25 nmol/l). Adverse events were rare. Testosterone had a strong effect on muscle mass and a modest to minimal effect on muscle strength and physical performance, respectively, when supplementing men with low serum levels (< 200-300 ng/dl). The adverse events were rare and mild. Insufficient evidence was available to recommend other pharmacological interventions.

conclusionOnly vitamin D, especially in older women, and testosterone in older men with clinical muscle weakness and low testosterone serum levels can be justified in daily clinical practice to improve muscle mass, muscle strength and/or physical performance.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAgedFemaleGeriatricsHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicMuscle StrengthSarcopeniaSystematic Reviews as TopicVitamin DVitaminsVitamin DVitamins

Identifiers

PMID30047068
OpenAlexW2883879428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.