Trial reportJAMA cardiology2018
Effect of Infusion of High-Density Lipoprotein Mimetic Containing Recombinant Apolipoprotein A-I Milano on Coronary Disease in Patients With an Acute Coronary Syndrome in the MILANO-PILOT Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02678923 (A Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized Trial to Compare the Effect of Treatment on Plaque Burden as Determined by Intravascular Ultrasound and to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of MDCO-216 Given as Multiple Weekly Infusions in Subjects With a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized Trial to Compare the Effect of Treatment on Plaque Burden as Determined by Intravascular Ultrasound and to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of MDCO-216 Given as Multiple Weekly Infusions in Subjects With a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of High-Density Lipoprotein/Apolipoprotein A1 Replacement Therapy in Humans and Mice With Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- MEDI6012: Recombinant Human Lecithin Cholesterol Acyltransferase, High-Density Lipoprotein, and Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Mediated Reverse Cholesterol Transport.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Trial
- CRISPR/dCas9-induced upregulation of endogenous apolipoprotein A1 and paraoxonase 1 genes reduces the aortic lipid deposits in apoEMolecular biomedicine · 2026Article
- Nanomedicine-based theranostics in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- A narrative review of impacts of apolipoproteins on atherosclerotic coronary plaques.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Targeting lymphatic dysfunction in atherosclerosis: a state-of-the-art review on potential therapies and future directions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Inventive HDL Mimicking Nanoparticles: A Promising Frontier in Cardiovascular Disease Management.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Review
- Innovative Lipid-Lowering Strategies: RNA-Based, Small Molecule, and Protein-Based Therapies.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Review
- High-density lipoproteins, Part 1. Epidemiology, antiatherogenic effects, and therapies designed to increase their serum levels.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
- New Approaches to Lipoproteins for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Review
- HDL-replacement therapy: From traditional to emerging clinical applications.Atherosclerosis plus · 2025Review
- Quo Vadis after AEGIS: New Opportunities for Therapies Targeted at Reverse Cholesterol Transport?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- High-Density Lipoprotein in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: Friend or Foe?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Ultra-small phospholipid nanoparticles in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.Research in pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Article
- Reversal of Atherosclerotic Plaque Growth and Vulnerability: Effects of Lipid-Modifying and Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutic Agents.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Atherosclerotic plaque stabilization and regression: a review of clinical evidence.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- The Gut Microbiome Affects Atherosclerosis by Regulating Reverse Cholesterol Transport.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024Review
- High-density lipoprotein cholesterol to apolipoprotein A-1 ratio is an important indicator predicting in-hospital death in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Cardiology journal · 2024Observational
- Recent advances of self-assembled nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of atherosclerosis.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Unraveling the Pleiotropic Role of High-Density Lipoproteins (HDLs) in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.International journal of rheumatology · 2024Review
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Infusing a high-density lipoprotein mimetic containing apolipoprotein A-I Milano demonstrated potential atheroma regression in patients following an acute coronary syndrome. To our knowledge, the effect of infusing a new mimetic preparation (MDCO-216) with contemporary statin therapy is unknown. Objective: To determine the effect of infusing MDCO-216 on coronary atherosclerosis progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted in 22 hospitals in Canada and Europe compared the effects of 5 weekly intravenous infusions of MDCO-216 at a dose of 20 mg/kg weekly (n = 59) with placebo (n = 67) in statin-treated patients with an acute coronary syndrome. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy measure was the nominal change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) from baseline to day 36 as measured by serial intravascular ultrasonography. The secondary efficacy measures were the nominal changes in normalized total atheroma volume (TAV), atheroma volume in the most diseased 10-mm segment, and the percentage of patients who demonstrated plaque regression. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: Among 122 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [10.4] years; 93 men [76.2%]; 61 [50.0%] with prior statin use; and a mean [SD] low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] level of 87.6 [40.5] mg/dL [to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259]), 113 (92.6%) had evaluable imaging results at follow-up. The receiving-treatment LDL-C levels were comparable with the placebo and MDCO-216 (68.6 vs 70.5 mg/dL; difference, -2.5 mg/dL; 95% CI, -10.1 to 5.0; P = .51). A reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels was observed in MDCO, but not placebo patients (-3.3 vs 3.0 mg/dL [to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259]; difference, -6.3 mg/dL; 95% CI, -8.5 to -4.1; P < .001). Percent atheroma volume, which was adjusted for baseline values, decreased 0.94% with the placebo and 0.21% with MDCO-216 (difference, 0.73%; 95% CI, -0.07 to 1.52; P = .07). Normalized TAV decreased 7.9 mm3 with the placebo and 6.4 mm3 with MDCO-216 (difference, 1.6 mm3; 95% CI, -5.6 to 8.7; P = .67), and atheroma volume in the most diseased segment decreased 1.8 mm3 with the placebo and 2.2 mm3 with MDCO-216 (difference 0.4 mm3; 95% CI, -4.4 to 3.5; P = .83). A similar percentage of patients demonstrated a regression of PAV (67.2% vs 55.8%; P = .21) and TAV (68.9% vs 71.2%; P = .79) in the placebo and MDCO-216 groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with an acute coronary syndrome, infusing MDCO-216 did not produce an incremental plaque regression in the setting of contemporary statin therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02678923.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.