Trial reportJAMA cardiology2018
Effect of Serial Infusions of CER-001, a Pre-β High-Density Lipoprotein Mimetic, on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients Following Acute Coronary Syndromes in the CER-001 Atherosclerosis Regression Acute Coronary Syndrome Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of High-Density Lipoprotein/Apolipoprotein A1 Replacement Therapy in Humans and Mice With Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- MEDI6012: Recombinant Human Lecithin Cholesterol Acyltransferase, High-Density Lipoprotein, and Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Mediated Reverse Cholesterol Transport.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Trial
- Nanomedicine-based theranostics in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Lipid-based nanosystems for atherosclerosis treatment: Evolving approaches and novel therapeutic strategies.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Review
- HDL in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Mechanistic Insight and Therapeutic Potential.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Targeting lymphatic dysfunction in atherosclerosis: a state-of-the-art review on potential therapies and future directions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Bioactive peptides targeting dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis: from computational discovery and data bottlenecks to precision medicine translation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Inventive HDL Mimicking Nanoparticles: A Promising Frontier in Cardiovascular Disease Management.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Review
- Innovative Lipid-Lowering Strategies: RNA-Based, Small Molecule, and Protein-Based Therapies.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Review
- High-density lipoproteins, Part 1. Epidemiology, antiatherogenic effects, and therapies designed to increase their serum levels.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
- Advances in coronary imaging of atherosclerotic plaques.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Asparagine endopeptidase cleaves apolipoprotein A1 and accelerates pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Long-term trajectories of apolipoprotein A1 and major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in a community cohort.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- HDL-replacement therapy: From traditional to emerging clinical applications.Atherosclerosis plus · 2025Review
- Quo Vadis after AEGIS: New Opportunities for Therapies Targeted at Reverse Cholesterol Transport?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Ultra-small phospholipid nanoparticles in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.Research in pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Article
- Understanding the heterogeneity and dysfunction of HDL in chronic kidney disease: insights from recent reviews.BMC nephrology · 2024Review
- Reversal of Atherosclerotic Plaque Growth and Vulnerability: Effects of Lipid-Modifying and Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutic Agents.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- High-Density Lipoprotein Subclasses and Their Role in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: CER-001 is a negatively charged, engineered pre-β high-density lipoprotein (HDL) mimetic containing apolipoprotein A-I and sphingomyelin. Preliminary studies demonstrated favorable effects of CER-001 on cholesterol efflux and vascular inflammation. A post hoc reanalysis of a previously completed study of intravenous infusion of CER-001, 3 mg/k, showed that the intravenous infusion in patients with a high coronary plaque burden promoted regression as assessed by intravascular ultrasonography. Objective: To determine the effect of infusing CER-001 on coronary atherosclerosis progression in statin-treated patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the effect of 10 weekly intravenous infusions of CER-001, 3 mg/kg, (n = 135) or placebo (n = 137) in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and baseline percent atheroma volume (PAV) greater than 30% in the proximal segment of an epicardial artery by intravascular ultrasonography. The study included 34 academic and community hospitals in Australia, Hungary, the Netherlands, and the United States in patients with ACS presenting for coronary angiography. Patients were enrolled from August 15, 2015, to November 19, 2016. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive weekly CER-001, 3 mg/kg, or placebo for 10 weeks in addition to statins. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy measure was the nominal change in PAV from baseline to day 78 measured by serial intravascular ultrasonography imaging. The secondary efficacy measures were nominal change in normalized total atheroma volume and percentage of patients demonstrating plaque regression. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: Among 293 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.8 [9.4] years; 217 men [79.8%] and 261 white race/ethnicity [96.0%]), 86 (29%) had statin prior use prior to the index ACS and 272 (92.8%) had evaluable imaging at follow-up. The placebo and CER-001 groups had similar posttreatment median levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (74 mg/dL vs 79 mg/dL; P = .15) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (43 mg/dL vs 44 mg/dL; P = .66). The primary efficacy measure, PAV, decreased 0.41% with placebo (P = .005 compared with baseline), but not with CER-001 (-0.09%; P = .67 compared with baseline; between group differences, 0.32%; P = .15). Similar percentages of patients in the placebo and CER-001 groups demonstrated regression of PAV (57.7% vs 53.3%; P = .49). Infusions were well tolerated, with no differences in clinical and laboratory adverse events observed between treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Infusion of CER-001 did not promote regression of coronary atherosclerosis in statin-treated patients with ACS and high plaque burden. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT2484378.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.