Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046802›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2018

Characteristics and Skin Cancer Risk Behaviors of Adult Sunless Tanners in the United States.

Melissa Dodds, Sarah T Arron, Eleni Linos, Ingrid Polcari, Matthew D Mansh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cross-sectional study of sex differences in psychosocial quality of life of long-term melanoma survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  5. Attitudes and Behaviors That Impact Skin Cancer Risk among Men.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa DoddsDepartment of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Sarah T ArronDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco.
Eleni LinosDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco.
Ingrid PolcariDepartment of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Matthew D ManshDepartment of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Targeted Advertising for Cancer PreventionDP2CA225433 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINOS, ELENI · 2017 to 2019
$2.9M
Online Advertising for Skin Cancer PreventionR21CA212201 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINOS, ELENI · 2017 to 2018
$379k
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA225433NCI NIH HHS R21 CA212201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Incidence rates of nonmelanoma and melanoma skin cancers are increasing rapidly in the United States likely because of increased UV light exposure. Sunless tanning is a safe alternative to achieve tanned skin that might help reduce skin cancer incidence by deterring risky behaviors. However, limited data exist on the characteristics and associated skin cancer risk behaviors of sunless tanners in the United States. Objective: To assess the demographic characteristics and skin cancer risk behaviors of sunless tanners among adults in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study used data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey, a population-based survey of the US noninstitutionalized civilian population. Participants included 27 353 men and women 18 years or older. Main Outcome and Measures: Participant demographics and skin cancer risk behaviors, including indoor tanning, skin cancer screening, sunburn, and sun protection behaviors. Results: Of the 27 353 adults (representative of more than 198 million US adults; mean [SE] age, 46.0 [0.2] years) studied, 6.4% (SE, 0.2%) reported sunless tanning. Factors associated with sunless tanning included being young, female, non-Hispanic white, college educated, nonobese, and sun sensitive, living in the western United States, and having a family history of skin cancer. Sunless tanners were more likely to report indoor tanning (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR], 3.77; 95% CI, 3.19-4.43; P < .001), recent sunburn (aPOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.31-1.83; P < .001), use of sunscreen (β = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28; P < .001), and having had a full-body skin examination (aPOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.51-2.08; P < .001) but less likely to seek shade (β = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.04; P = .001) or use protective clothing when outdoors (long pants: β = -0.18; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.11; P < .001; long sleeves: β = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.03; P = .01). Among indoor tanners, sunless tanners compared with those who did not sunless tan reported increased frequency of indoor tanning (mean [SE], 19.2 [1.9] vs 14.9 [1.2] sessions in the past 12 months; P = .04) but no differences in other skin cancer risk behaviors. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that sunless tanning is associated with risky skin cancer-related behaviors. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether sunless tanning changes UV exposure behaviors to better determine whether sunless tanning represents an effective public health strategy to reduce rates of skin cancer in the United States.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesHealth Risk BehaviorsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusEthnicityFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotosensitivity DisordersSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID30046802
PMCPMC6143043
OpenAlexW2884404164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.