Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046760›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2018

The coagulation system in host defense.

Silvio Antoniak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Immunity and coagulation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvio AntoniakProgram in Thrombosis and Hemostasis Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5523-825X
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Inhibition of PAR2 as therapeutic approach to enhance anti-viral immune responsesR01HL142799 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ANTONIAK, SILVIO · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood coagulation system and immune system of higher organisms are thought to have a common ancestral origin. During infections, the blood coagulation system is activated and components of the hemostatic system are directly involved in the immune response and immune system modulations. The current view is that the activation of coagulation is beneficial for infections with bacteria and viruses. It limits pathogen dissemination and supports pathogen killing and tissue repair. On the other hand, over-activation can lead to thrombosis with subsequent depletion of hemostatic factors and secondary bleeding. This review will summarize the current knowledge on blood coagulation and pathogen infection with focus on most recent studies of the role of the different parts of the blood coagulation system in selected bacterial and viral infections.

Indexed as

coagulationhemostasisinfectioninflammationperitonitispneumonia

Identifiers

PMID30046760
PMCPMC6046589
OpenAlexW2803239426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.