Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046752›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2018

Electronic alerts, comparative practitioner metrics, and education improve thromboprophylaxis and reduce venous thrombosis in community hospitals.

Scott C Woller, Scott M Stevens, R Scott Evans, Daniel Wray, John Christensen, Valerie T Aston, Matthew Wayne, James F Lloyd, Emily L Wilson, C Gregory Elliott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Natural Language Processing Performance for the Identification of Venous Thromboembolism in an Integrated Healthcare System.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Scott C WollerDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.
Scott M StevensDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.
R Scott EvansDepartment of Medical Informatics Intermountain Healthcare Murray UT USA.
Daniel WrayTwine Clinical Consulting, LLC Park City UT USA.
John ChristensenDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.
Valerie T AstonDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.
Matthew WayneMedical Impact Ventures LLC Austin TX USA.
James F LloydDepartment of Medical Informatics Intermountain Healthcare Murray UT USA.
Emily L WilsonDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.
C Gregory ElliottDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.
Intermountain Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USClinical Research Consulting · USCommunity Impact · USIntermountain Healthcare · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous thromboembolism prophylaxis remains underutilized in hospitalized medical patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. We previously reported that a multifaceted intervention was associated with a sustained increase in appropriate thromboprophylaxis and reduced symptomatic venous thromboembolism among medical patients hospitalized in two urban teaching hospitals. The effectiveness of this intervention in community hospitals is unknown.

methodsWe performed a prospective multicenter cohort study in three community hospitals. All medical patients admitted from February 1, 2011 to January 31, 2014 were eligible. Consecutive eligible patients were enrolled into the 12-month "control," 12-month "intervention," or 12-month "maintenance" group. We provided electronic alerts, physician performance feedback, and targeted medical education for the intervention group. Only the alert component of the intervention continued in the maintenance group. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis among patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism defined as the prescription of guideline recommended chemoprophylaxis, or identification of a chemoprophylaxis contraindication. Secondary outcomes included rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, all-cause mortality, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, physician satisfaction, and alert fatigue.

resultsAppropriate thromboprophylaxis when compared to the control group rate of 67% was higher for the intervention group (85%) and for the maintenance group (77%;

conclusionsThis multifaceted intervention was associated with an overall increase in appropriate thromboprophylaxis of medical patients compared with the control period. Hospital-associated venous thrombosis rates decreased.

Indexed as

preventionquality improvementthromboprophylaxis medical patientvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID30046752
PMCPMC6046588
OpenAlexW2807097735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.