ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2018
Imaging platelet biogenesis in vivo.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Platelet Research Through Live-Cell Imaging: Challenges, Techniques, and Insights.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- SARS-CoV-2 infection modifies the transcriptome of the megakaryocytes in the bone marrow.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma in Dermatology: New Insights on the Cellular Mechanism of Skin Repair and Regeneration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Rasa3 deficiency minimally affects thrombopoiesis but promotes severe thrombocytopenia due to integrin-dependent platelet clearance.JCI insight · 2022Article
- Emerging roles of platelets in cancer biology and their potential as therapeutic targets.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Lessons to learn from tumor-educated platelets.Blood · 2021Review
- Megakaryocyte volume modulates bone marrow niche properties and cell migration dynamics.Haematologica · 2020Article
- The "Janus Face" of Platelets in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Imaging Platelet Processes and Function-Current and Emerging Approaches for ImagingFrontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Impact of Itga2-Gp6-double collagen receptor deficient mice for bone marrow megakaryocytes and platelets.PloS one · 2019Article
- Imaging platelet biogenesis in vivo.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review paper, we give a historical perspective of the development of imaging modalities to visualize platelet biogenesis and how this contributed to our current understanding of megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis. We provide some insight how distinct in vivo and in situ imaging methods, including ultramicrographs, have contributed to the current concepts of platelet formation. The onset of intravital microscopy into the mouse bone marrow has markedly modified and challenged our thinking of platelet biogenesis during the last decade. Finally, we discuss ongoing work, which was presented at the recent International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) meeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.