ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2017
Statin use and risk of recurrent venous thrombosis: results from the MEGA follow-up study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of lipid-lowering drugs with venous thromboembolism outcomes: a phenome-wide association study and a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes Associated with Statin Use in Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The role of statins in mitigating venous thromboembolism incidence and severity.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Statins use and recurrent venous thromboembolism in the direct oral anticoagulant era: insight from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2024Article
- Statins during Anticoagulation for Emergency Life-Threatening Venous Thromboembolism: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Statins and Venous Thromboembolic Disease - Where are we Now?Current vascular pharmacology · 2024Review
- Comment to: risk factors of venous thromboembolism after incisional ventral hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Article
- A two-sample Mendelian randomization study of circulating lipids and deep venous thrombosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Preoperative oncologic therapy and the prolonged risk of venous thromboembolism in resectable pancreatic cancer.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Differential effect of statin use on coagulation markers: an active comparative analysis in the NEO study.Thrombosis journal · 2021Article
- Dissolution of metastatic thymic carcinoma-associated right atrial thrombus with rivaroxaban.SAGE open medical case reports · 2020Article
- Statin use and risk of recurrent venous thrombosis: results from the MEGA follow-up study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhether statin use after first venous thrombosis reduces the risk of recurrence is uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to examine the risk of recurrent venous thrombosis in statin users vs non-users.
methodsPatients with a first venous thrombosis were recruited from the MEGA follow-up study. Information on statin use was obtained by linkage to the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics register. Linkage was successful in 54% of all patients (n = 2,547). Cox-regression models with statin-exposure as a time-dependent co-variate were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI 95) for recurrence.
resultsStatin therapy was continued in 153 (6.0%) patients and initiated in 233 (9.1%) patients during a median follow-up of 5.7 years. There were 367 recurrent venous thrombotic events, of which 32 occurred among statin users. Incident statin use was associated with 22% reduced risk of recurrence after multivariable adjustments (HR 0.78, CI 95: 0.46-1.31), and 13% reduced risk after propensity score adjustment (HR 0.87, CI 95: 0.52-1.47). Statin use seemed not to have an effect on recurrence in patients with an unprovoked first event (multivariable HR 1.03, CI 95: 0.54-1.98), but the statistical power was low due to few events and the results must be interpreted with caution. In general, the risk estimates were slightly attenuated when prevalent users were included in the analyses.
conclusionOur findings suggest that statins may have a modest decreasing effect on the risk of recurrent venous thrombosis. While we took care to minimize bias and confounding, the causality of the association is still unsettled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.