Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046679›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2017

Statin use and risk of recurrent venous thrombosis: results from the MEGA follow-up study.

Sigrid K Brækkan, Camila Caram-Deelder, Bob Siegerink, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Saskia le Cessie, Frits R Rosendaal, Suzanne C Cannegieter, Willem M Lijfering

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The role of statins in mitigating venous thromboembolism incidence and severity.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Comment to: risk factors of venous thromboembolism after incisional ventral hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sigrid K BrækkanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Camila Caram-DeelderDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Bob SiegerinkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Astrid van Hylckama VliegDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Saskia le CessieDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Frits R RosendaalDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Suzanne C CannegieterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Willem M LijferingDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLSanquin · NLCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhether statin use after first venous thrombosis reduces the risk of recurrence is uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to examine the risk of recurrent venous thrombosis in statin users vs non-users.

methodsPatients with a first venous thrombosis were recruited from the MEGA follow-up study. Information on statin use was obtained by linkage to the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics register. Linkage was successful in 54% of all patients (n = 2,547). Cox-regression models with statin-exposure as a time-dependent co-variate were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI 95) for recurrence.

resultsStatin therapy was continued in 153 (6.0%) patients and initiated in 233 (9.1%) patients during a median follow-up of 5.7 years. There were 367 recurrent venous thrombotic events, of which 32 occurred among statin users. Incident statin use was associated with 22% reduced risk of recurrence after multivariable adjustments (HR 0.78, CI 95: 0.46-1.31), and 13% reduced risk after propensity score adjustment (HR 0.87, CI 95: 0.52-1.47). Statin use seemed not to have an effect on recurrence in patients with an unprovoked first event (multivariable HR 1.03, CI 95: 0.54-1.98), but the statistical power was low due to few events and the results must be interpreted with caution. In general, the risk estimates were slightly attenuated when prevalent users were included in the analyses.

conclusionOur findings suggest that statins may have a modest decreasing effect on the risk of recurrent venous thrombosis. While we took care to minimize bias and confounding, the causality of the association is still unsettled.

Indexed as

deep vein thrombosispulmonary embolismrecurrencestatinsvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID30046679
PMCPMC6058203
OpenAlexW2620052342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.