Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046658›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2018

Barriers and Enablers to Organ Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Beliefs of Frontline Intensive Care Unit Professionals and Organ Donor Coordinators.

Janet E Squires, Nicole Graham, Mary Coughlin, Michaël Chassé, Stefanie Linklater, Megan Greenough, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Sam D Shemie, Sonny Dhanani, Gregory A Knoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nurses' attitudes and knowledge about organ donation and transplantation in closed hospital wards.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Missed opportunities in organ donation.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A three-tier system for evaluation of organ procurement organizations' willingness to pursue and utilize nonideal donor lungs.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janet E SquiresSchool of Nursing, Department of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nicole GrahamSchool of Nursing, Department of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mary CoughlinClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michaël ChasséDépartment de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Stefanie LinklaterClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Megan GreenoughSchool of Nursing, Department of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jeremy M GrimshawDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sam D ShemieDivision of Critical Care, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sonny DhananiDeceased Organ Donation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Gregory A KnollDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA shortage of transplantable organs is a global problem. The purpose of this study was to explore frontline intensive care unit professionals' and organ donor coordinators' perceptions and beliefs around the process of, and the barriers and enablers to, donation after circulatory determination death (DCDD).

methodsThis qualitative descriptive study used a semistructured interview guide informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework to interview 55 key informants (physicians, nurses, and organ donation coordinators) in intensive care units (hospitals) and organ donation organizations across Canada.

resultsInterviews were analyzed using a 6-step systematic approach: coding, generation of specific beliefs, identification of themes, aggregation of themes into categories, assignment of barrier or enabler and analysis for shared and unique discipline barriers and enablers. Seven broad categories encompassing 29 themes of barriers (n = 21) and enablers (n = 4) to DCDD use were identified; n = 4 (14%) themes were conflicting, acting as barriers and enablers. Most themes (n = 26) were shared across the 3 key informant groups while n = 3 themes were unique to physicians. The top 3 shared barriers were: (1) DCDD education is needed for healthcare professionals, (2) a standardized and systematic screening process to identify potential DCDD donors is needed, and (3) practice variation across regions with respect to communication about DCDD with families. A limited number of differences were found by region.

conclusionsMultiple barriers and enablers to DCDD use were identified. These beliefs identify potential individual, team, organization, and system targets for behavior change interventions to increase DCDD rates which, in turn, should lead to more transplantation, reducing patient morbidity and mortality at a population level.

Identifiers

PMID30046658
PMCPMC6056272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.