Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046593›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

C-Kit Cardiac Progenitor Cell Based Cell Sheet Improves Vascularization and Attenuates Cardiac Remodeling following Myocardial Infarction in Rats.

K Dergilev, Z Tsokolaeva, P Makarevich, I Beloglazova, E Zubkova, M Boldyreva, E Ratner, D Dyikanov, M Menshikov, A Ovchinnikov and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K DergilevLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2712-4997
Z TsokolaevaLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.
P MakarevichLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-5190
I BeloglazovaLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.
E ZubkovaLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.
M BoldyrevaLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8309-0018
E RatnerLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0920-4029
D DyikanovLaboratory of Gene and Cell Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3159-6620
M MenshikovLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.
A OvchinnikovConsultative and Diagnostic Department, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.
F AgeevConsultative and Diagnostic Department, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.
Ye ParfyonovaLaboratory of Angiogenesis, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUNational Medical Research Center of Cardiology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult heart contains small populations of multipotent cardiac progenitor cells (CPC) that present a convenient and efficient resource for treatment of myocardial infarction. Several clinical studies of direct CPC delivery by injection have already been performed but showed low engraftment rate that limited beneficial effects of procedure.

Indexed as

Myocytes, CardiacStem CellsVascular RemodelingAnimalsMaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumRatsRats, Wistar

Identifiers

PMID30046593
PMCPMC6036839
OpenAlexW2808941682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.