Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046424›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2018

Trends in UK endoscopy training in the BSG trainees' national survey and strategic planning for the future.

Sujata Biswas, Laith Alrubaiy, Louise China, British Society of Gastroenterology Trainees’ Section, Melanie Lockett, Antony Ellis, Neil Hawkes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of gastroenterology training curriculum in Greece.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. COVID-19 and endoscopy training.Frontline gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sujata BiswasTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Laith AlrubaiyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Louise ChinaDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5870-2310
British Society of Gastroenterology Trainees’ Section
Melanie LockettDepartment of Gastroenterology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Antony EllisTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Neil HawkesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBRoyal Glamorgan Hospital · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprovements in the structure of endoscopy training programmes resulting in certification from the Joint Advisory Group in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have been acknowledged to improve training experience and contribute to enhanced colonoscopy performance.

objectivesThe 2016 British Society of Gastroenterology trainees' survey of endoscopy training explored the delivery of endoscopy training - access to lists; level of supervision and trainee's progression through diagnostic, core therapy and subspecialty training. In addition, the barriers to endoscopy training progress and utility of training tools were examined.

methodsA web-based survey (Survey Monkey) was sent to all higher specialty gastroenterology trainees.

resultsThere were some improvements in relation to earlier surveys; 85% of trainees were satisfied with the level of supervision of their training. But there were ongoing problems; 12.5% of trainees had no access to a regular training list, and 53% of final year trainees had yet to achieve full certification in colonoscopy. 9% of final year trainees did not feel confident in endoscopic management of upper GI bleeds.

conclusionsThe survey findings provide a challenge to those agencies tasked with supporting endoscopy training in the UK. Acknowledging the findings of the survey, the paper provides a strategic response with reference to increased service pressures, reduced overall training time in specialty training programmes and the requirement to support general medical and surgical on-call commitments. It describes the steps required to improve training on the ground: delivering additional training tools and learning resources, and introducing certification standards for therapeutic modalities in parallel with goals for improving the quality of endoscopy in the UK.

Indexed as

endoscopic proceduresendoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30046424
PMCPMC6056087
OpenAlexW2760787875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.