Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046391›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Diagnostic tools in the differential diagnosis of giant cell-rich lesions of bone at biopsy.

Jan Rehkämper, Konrad Steinestel, Birte Jeiler, Sandra Elges, Elena Hekeler, Sebastian Huss, Jan Sperveslage, Jendrik Hardes, Arne Streitbürger, Georg Gosheger and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Absence of H3F3A mutation in a subset of malignant giant cell tumor of bone.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan RehkämperGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Konrad SteinestelGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Birte JeilerGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Sandra ElgesGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Elena HekelerGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Sebastian HussGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jan SperveslageGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jendrik HardesDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Arne StreitbürgerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Georg GoshegerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Eva WardelmannGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Daniel BaumhoerBone Tumor Reference Centre, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Marcel TrautmannGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Wolfgang HartmannGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEBundeswehrkrankenhaus · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of giant cell-rich lesions of bone can be challenging if radiological findings are ambiguous and tissue of the biologically deciding component is underrepresented in biopsy specimens. The frequent association of giant cell tumor of bone (GCT) and chondroblastoma (CB) with (secondary) aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) may further impede correct classification. The present study evaluates the potentials and limitations of mutation-specific histone H3.3 and DOG1 immunohistochemistry, Sanger-/next generation sequencing (NGS) and FISH analysis in the differential diagnosis of 23 GCT, 14 CB and 19 ABC. All morphologically typical GCT and CB harbored mutations in the

Indexed as

aneurysmal bone cystchondroblastomadiagnostic algorithmgiant cell tumor of boneH3F3A/B

Identifiers

PMID30046391
PMCPMC6059026
OpenAlexW2871814895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.