Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046257›Full record

ArticleTobacco use insights2018

Exploring Physician Attitudes Regarding Electronic Documentation of E-cigarette Use: A Qualitative Study.

Samantha Hurst, Mike Conway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco use insights, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. E-Cigarette Screening in Primary Care.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Otolaryngology Resident Education and Perceptions of e-cigarettes.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Improved Documentation of Electronic Cigarette Use in an Electronic Health Record.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samantha HurstDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mike ConwayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this article, we present qualitative work designed to explore physicians' attitudes toward and knowledge of electronic cigarettes (or Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems-ENDS), particularly focusing on personal attitudes held by physicians regarding ENDS use, physician beliefs regarding the relative safety of ENDS, attitudes regarding the efficacy of ENDS as a smoking cessation tool, and how physicians' document ENDS use in the electronic health record (EHR).

methodsWe completed a total of 17 semistructured qualitative interviews with physicians in 4 different outpatient clinic locations. Clinics were selected with the goal of reaching patient panels across a diversity of socioeconomic and local geographic locations.

resultsThe findings from our qualitative analysis suggest that physicians feel uninformed about the long-term health risks of ENDS and believe that they lack the critical medical knowledge required for discussing ENDS with their patients who smoke. Although physician responses did not endorse the view that ENDS use is a safer alternative to combustible tobacco use, approximately one-third of our physician sample did not hold strong objections to ENDS usage. Physicians placed varying degrees of importance on the issue of ENDS documentation practices. DISCUSSION: Three overarching themes were revealed from our analysis. These themes included (1) physicians' attitudes regarding the use of ENDS for smoking cessation, (2) physicians' guidance and advisement to patients in the use of ENDS for smoking cessation, and (3) current practices of clinical documentation of ENDS use in an EHR. Our qualitative results indicate that physicians in our study rarely screen patients for ENDS use, even for those patients who are both documented smokers and recipients of physician-led tobacco cessation counseling. However, most physicians agreed that the prospect of creating a structured data field specifically for the documentation of ENDS use within the EHR would result in the likelihood of increased screening and documentation of ENDS use patterns.

Indexed as

e-cigaretteselectronic cigaretteselectronic health recordsElectronic Nicotine Delivery Systemssmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID30046257
PMCPMC6055248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.