Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046156›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

Overnight memory consolidation facilitates rather than interferes with new learning of similar materials-a study probing NMDA receptors.

M Alizadeh Asfestani, E Braganza, J Schwidetzky, J Santiago, S Soekadar, J Born, G B Feld

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Neurochemical mechanisms for memory processing during sleep: basic findings in humans and neuropsychiatric implications.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  4. eNeuro
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M Alizadeh AsfestaniInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. marjan.alizadeh-asfestani@uni-tuebingen.de.
E BraganzaInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J SchwidetzkyInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J SantiagoInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
S SoekadarDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J BornInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
G B FeldInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. g.feld@ucl.ac.uk.
University of Tübingen · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen · DEDeutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) FE 1617/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although sleep-dependent consolidation and its neurochemical underpinnings have been strongly researched, less is known about how consolidation during sleep affects subsequent learning. Since sleep enhances memory, it can be expected to pro-actively interfere with learning after sleep, in particular of similar materials. This pro-active interference should be enhanced by substances that benefit consolidation during sleep, such as D-cycloserine. We tested this hypothesis in two groups (Sleep, Wake) of young healthy participants receiving on one occasion D-cycloserine (175 mg) and on another occasion placebo, according to a double-blind balanced crossover design. Treatment was administered after participants had learned a set of word pairs (A-B list) and before nocturnal retention periods of sleep vs. wakefulness. After D-cycloserine blood plasma levels had dropped to negligible amounts, i.e., the next day in the evening, participants learned, in three sequential runs, new sets of word pairs. One list-to enhance interference-consisted of the same cue words as the original set paired with a new target word (A-C list) and the other of completely new cue words (D-E set). Unexpectedly, during post-retention learning the A-C interference list was generally better learned than the completely new D-E list, which suggests that consolidation of previously encoded similar material enhances memory integration rather than pro-active interference. Consistent with this view, new learning of word pairs was better after sleep than wakefulness. Similarly, D-cycloserine generally enhanced learning of new word pairs, compared to placebo. This effect being independent of sleep or wakefulness, leads us to speculate that D-cycloserine, in addition to enhancing sleep-dependent consolidation, might mediate a time-dependent process of active forgetting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesCycloserineDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyHumansLearningMaleMemory ConsolidationPolysomnographyReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSleepWakefulnessYoung AdultCycloserineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID30046156
PMCPMC6135744
OpenAlexW2766992316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.