Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046142›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Weighted Symbolic Dependence Metric (wSDM) for fMRI resting-state connectivity: A multicentric validation for frontotemporal dementia.

Sebastian Moguilner, Adolfo M García, Ezequiel Mikulan, Eugenia Hesse, Indira García-Cordero, Margherita Melloni, Sabrina Cervetto, Cecilia Serrano, Eduar Herrera, Pablo Reyes and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multivariate word properties in fluency tasks reveal markers of Alzheimer's dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dementia ConnEEGtome: Towards multicentric harmonization of EEG connectivity in neurodegeneration.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Interoception Primes Emotional Processing: Multimodal Evidence from Neurodegeneration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. Metacognition of emotion recognition across neurodegenerative diseases.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Sebastian MoguilnerLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-8325
Adolfo M GarcíaLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6936-0114
Ezequiel MikulanLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eugenia HesseLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Indira García-CorderoLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Margherita MelloniLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sabrina CervettoLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cecilia SerranoNeurologia Cognitiva. Hospital Cesar Milstein., Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduar HerreraLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo ReyesIntellectus Memory and Cognition Center, Aging Institute, Mental Health and Psychiatry Department, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6705-7157
Diana MatallanaIntellectus Memory and Cognition Center, Aging Institute, Mental Health and Psychiatry Department, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Facundo ManesLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-1899-1426
Agustín IbáñezLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lucas SedeñoLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina. lsedeno@ineco.org.ar.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARAustralian Research Council · AUPontificia Universidad Javeriana · COHospital César Milstein · ARUniversidad de la República de Uruguay · UYUniversidad Nacional de Cuyo · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases via fMRI functional connectivity (FC) research has yielded inconsistent results. Yet, most FC studies are blind to non-linear brain dynamics. To circumvent this limitation, we developed a "weighted Symbolic Dependence Metric" (wSDM) measure. Using symbolic transforms, we factor in local and global temporal features of the BOLD signal to weigh a robust copula-based dependence measure by symbolic similarity, capturing both linear and non-linear associations. We compared this measure with a linear connectivity metric (Pearson's R) in its capacity to identify patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and controls based on resting-state data. We recruited participants from two international centers with different MRI recordings to assess the consistency of our measure across heterogeneous conditions. First, a seed-analysis comparison of the salience network (a specific target of bvFTD) and the default-mode network (as a complementary control) between patients and controls showed that wSDM yields better identification of resting-state networks. Moreover, machine learning analysis revealed that wSDM yielded higher classification accuracy. These results were consistent across centers, highlighting their robustness despite heterogeneous conditions. Our findings underscore the potential of wSDM to assess fMRI-derived FC data, and to identify sensitive biomarkers in bvFTD.

Indexed as

AgedBrainBrain MappingFemaleFrontotemporal DementiaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMembrane PotentialsMiddle AgedNeural Pathways

Identifiers

PMID30046142
PMCPMC6060104
OpenAlexW2884462971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.