Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30046066›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Saccade metrics reflect decision-making dynamics during urgent choices.

Joshua A Seideman, Terrence R Stanford, Emilio Salinas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contributions of Distinct Attention Mechanisms to Saccadic Choices in a Gamified, Dynamic Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Factorial variation of saccade vigor with dual decision processes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. The forced-response method: Urgency rediscovered.Behavior research methods · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Rapid, systematic updating of movement by accumulated decision evidence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Self-motion perception and sequential decision-making: where are we heading?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua A SeidemanDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157-1010, USA. jseidema@wakehealth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3019-2130
Terrence R StanfordDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157-1010, USA.
Emilio SalinasDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157-1010, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-5693

Funding

CRCNS: investigating perceptual processing speed and its impact on choice behaviorR01EY025172 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALINAS, EMILIO, STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 2016 to 2024
$3.6M
Midbrain Mechanisms of Sensory-Guided Oculomotor ChoiceR01EY021228 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALINAS, EMILIO, STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
Training Program in Multisensory ProcessesT32NS073553 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEIN, BARRY E · 2011 to 2020
$1.7M
CRCNS:Investigating perceptual processing speed and its impact on choice behaviorR01DA030750 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALINAS, EMILIO, STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
Elucidating the role of the lateral intraparietal area in visually-guided choice behaviorF31EY029154 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SEIDEMAN, JOSHUA · 2018 to 2020
$118k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY029154NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021228NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025172NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030750NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS073553U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) F31EY029154U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) R01EY021228U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) R01EY025172U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) T32NS073553U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) R01DA030750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A perceptual judgment is typically characterized by constructing psychometric and chronometric functions, i.e., by mapping the accuracies and reaction times of motor choices as functions of a sensory stimulus feature dimension. Here, we show that various saccade metrics (e.g., peak velocity) are similarly modulated as functions of sensory cue viewing time during performance of an urgent-decision task. Each of the newly discovered functions reveals the dynamics of the perceptual evaluation process inherent to the underlying judgment. Remarkably, saccade peak velocity correlates with statistical decision confidence, suggesting that saccade kinematics reflect the degree of certainty with which an urgent perceptual decision is made. The data were explained by a race-to-threshold model that also replicates standard performance measures and cortical oculomotor neuronal activity in the task. The results indicate that, although largely stereotyped, saccade metrics carry subtle but reliable traces of the underlying cognitive processes that give rise to each oculomotor choice.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingMacaca mulattaMaleModels, TheoreticalOculomotor Nerve

Identifiers

PMID30046066
PMCPMC6060154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.