Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045917›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2018

Neutral lineage tracing of proliferative embryonic and adult mammary stem/progenitor cells.

Bethan Lloyd-Lewis, Felicity M Davis, Olivia B Harris, Jessica R Hitchcock, Christine J Watson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The molecular chronology of mammary epithelial cell fate switching.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Using Organoids to Tap Mammary Gland Diversity for Novel Insight.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Cellular Organization of the Mammary Gland: Insights From Microscopy.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Multiscale imaging of basal cell dynamics in the functionally mature mammary gland.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bethan Lloyd-LewisDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK bethan.lloyd-lewis@curie.fr f.davis@uq.edu.au cjw53@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6511-1818
Felicity M DavisDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK bethan.lloyd-lewis@curie.fr f.davis@uq.edu.au cjw53@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9112-118X
Olivia B HarrisDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2641-6472
Jessica R HitchcockDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.
Christine J WatsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK bethan.lloyd-lewis@curie.fr f.davis@uq.edu.au cjw53@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-5902
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MR/J001023/1Medical Research Council MR/N022963/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105377/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammary gland development occurs over multiple phases, beginning in the mammalian embryo and continuing throughout reproductive life. The remarkable morphogenetic capacity of the mammary gland at each stage of development is attributed to the activities of distinct populations of mammary stem cells (MaSCs) and progenitor cells. However, the relationship between embryonic and adult MaSCs, and their fate during different waves of mammary gland morphogenesis, remains unclear. By employing a neutral, low-density genetic labelling strategy, we characterised the contribution of proliferative stem/progenitor cells to embryonic, pubertal and reproductive mammary gland development. Our findings further support a model of lineage restriction of MaSCs in the postnatal mammary gland, and highlight extensive redundancy and heterogeneity within the adult stem/progenitor cell pool. Furthermore, our data suggest extensive multiplicity in their foetal precursors that give rise to the primordial mammary epithelium before birth. In addition, using a single-cell labelling approach, we revealed the extraordinary capacity of a single embryonic MaSC to contribute to postnatal ductal development. Together, these findings provide tantalising new insights into the disparate and stage-specific contribution of distinct stem/progenitor cells to mammary gland development.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAdult Stem CellsAnimalsCell ProliferationEmbryonic DevelopmentMammary Glands, AnimalMiceMorphogenesisMouse Embryonic Stem CellsSexual MaturationSingle-Cell AnalysisAdult mammary stem cellsEmbryonic mammary stem cellsLineage tracingMammary gland development

Identifiers

PMID30045917
PMCPMC6078330
OpenAlexW2884840949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.