Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045892›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

Flat and microstructured polymeric membranes in organs-on-chips.

Thijs Pasman, Dirk Grijpma, Dimitrios Stamatialis, Andreas Poot

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Skin-on-chip: Quo vadis?APL bioengineering · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Design strategy primer for organ-on-chips.Biomaterials translational · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in the Model Structure of In Vitro Vascularized Organ-on-a-Chip.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thijs PasmanBiomaterials Science and Technology, Universiteit Twente Faculteit Technische Natuurwetenschappen, Enschede, The Netherlands t.pasman@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7558-2258
Dirk GrijpmaBiomaterials Science and Technology, Universiteit Twente Faculteit Technische Natuurwetenschappen, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Dimitrios StamatialisBiomaterials Science and Technology, Universiteit Twente Faculteit Technische Natuurwetenschappen, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Andreas PootBiomaterials Science and Technology, Universiteit Twente Faculteit Technische Natuurwetenschappen, Enschede, The Netherlands a.a.poot@utwente.nl.
University of Twente · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, organs-on-chips (OOCs) have been developed to meet the desire for more realistic

Indexed as

Artificial OrgansCell Culture TechniquesLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMembranes, ArtificialMicrofluidicsAnimalsHumansPorosityMembranes, Artificialbiomaterialsmembranesmicrofabricationorgans-on-chipspolymers

Identifiers

PMID30045892
PMCPMC6073644
OpenAlexW2883572080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.