Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045888›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

Systems protobiology: origin of life in lipid catalytic networks.

Doron Lancet, Raphael Zidovetzki, Omer Markovitch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evolution from Composome to RNA Replicase.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Protopeptide backbone affects assembly in aqueous solutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Is the emergence of life and of agency expected?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Origins of life: the possible and the actual.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The prebiotic emergence of biological evolution.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The ecology-evolution continuum and the origin of life.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Doron LancetDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel doron.lancet@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-1393
Raphael ZidovetzkiDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0102-0196
Omer MarkovitchOrigins Center, Center for Systems Chemistry, Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9706-5323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life is that which replicates and evolves, but there is no consensus on how life emerged. We advocate a systems protobiology view, whereby the first replicators were assemblies of spontaneously accreting, heterogeneous and mostly non-canonical amphiphiles. This view is substantiated by rigorous chemical kinetics simulations of the graded autocatalysis replication domain (GARD) model, based on the notion that the replication or reproduction of compositional information predated that of sequence information. GARD reveals the emergence of privileged non-equilibrium assemblies (composomes), which portray catalysis-based homeostatic (concentration-preserving) growth. Such a process, along with occasional assembly fission, embodies cell-like reproduction. GARD pre-RNA evolution is evidenced in the selection of different composomes within a sparse fitness landscape, in response to environmental chemical changes. These observations refute claims that GARD assemblies (or other mutually catalytic networks in the metabolism first scenario) cannot evolve. Composomes represent both a genotype and a selectable phenotype, anteceding present-day biology in which the two are mostly separated. Detailed GARD analyses show attractor-like transitions from random assemblies to self-organized composomes, with negative entropy change, thus establishing composomes as dissipative systems-hallmarks of life. We show a preliminary new version of our model, metabolic GARD (M-GARD), in which lipid covalent modifications are orchestrated by non-enzymatic lipid catalysts, themselves compositionally reproduced. M-GARD fills the gap of the lack of true metabolism in basic GARD, and is rewardingly supported by a published experimental instance of a lipid-based mutually catalytic network. Anticipating near-future far-reaching progress of molecular dynamics, M-GARD is slated to quantitatively depict elaborate protocells, with orchestrated reproduction of both lipid bilayer and lumenal content. Finally, a GARD analysis in a whole-planet context offers the potential for estimating the probability of life's emergence. The invigorated GARD scrutiny presented in this review enhances the validity of autocatalytic sets as a

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, ChemicalOrigin of LifeSystems BiologyArtificial CellsCatalysisLipidsLipidscomposome networksmetabolism firstorigin of lifeprebiotic evolutionpre-RNA worldreflexively autocatalytic sets

Identifiers

PMID30045888
PMCPMC6073634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.