Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045886›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2018

Who are you, subdistal appendages of centriole?

Rustem Uzbekov, Irina Alieva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Structure and dynamics of photoreceptor sensory cilia.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Human centrosome organization and function in interphase and mitosis.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Primary cilia biogenesis and associated retinal ciliopathies.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The sperm centrioles.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rustem UzbekovFaculté de Médecine, Université de Tours, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37032 Tours, France rustem.uzbekov@univ-tours.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9336-5484
Irina AlievaBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Leninskye gory 1-40, 119992 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes data that assign morphological, biochemical and functional characteristics of two types of structures that are associated with centrioles: distal appendages and subdistal appendages. The description of centriole subdistal appendages is often a matter of confusion, both due to the numerous names used to describe these structures and because of their variability among species and cell types. Thus, we have summarized our current knowledge in this review. We conclude that distal appendages and subdistal appendages are fundamentally different in composition and function in the cell. While in centrioles there are always nine distal appendages, the number of subdistal appendages can vary depending on the type of cells and their functional state.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCentriolesHumansMicrotubulesModels, Molecularcentrioledistal appendagessubdistal appendages

Identifiers

PMID30045886
PMCPMC6070718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.