Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045835›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2018

Differences in the Use and Opinions About New eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Psychosis: Structured Questionnaire.

Lucia Bonet, Blanca Llácer, Miguel Hernandez-Viadel, David Arce, Ignacio Blanquer, Carlos Cañete, Maria Escartí, Ana M González-Pinto, Julio Sanjuán

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03807388 (The Use of ReMindCare Application for Smartphone in Treatment of Patients From First Episode of Psychosis Unit in the Clinic Hospital of Valencia, Spain.), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03807388 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Use of ReMindCare Application for Smartphone in Treatment of Patients From First Episode of Psychosis Unit in the Clinic Hospital of Valencia, Spain.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVARan2019 to 2023Enrolled140ConditionsPsychosis, Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders, DeliriumArmsReMindCare Intervention Group, Treatment as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Access and use of digital technology by patients with psychosis at a hospital in South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucia Bonet *Department of Clinic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-0590
Blanca LlácerCentre of Biomedical Investigation in Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Spanish Government Carlos III Health Institute, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6456-3556
Miguel Hernandez-ViadelDepartment of Mental Health, Sanitary Research Institute of Valencia (INCLIVA), Hospital Clínico of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6979-1192
David ArceInstitute of Instrumentation for Molecular Imaging (I3M), Joint centre CSIC & Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1141-2126
Ignacio BlanquerInstitute of Instrumentation for Molecular Imaging (I3M), Joint centre CSIC & Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1692-8922
Carlos CañeteDepartment of Mental Health, Sanitary Research Institute of Valencia (INCLIVA), Hospital Clínico of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-0899
Maria EscartíDepartment of Mental Health, Font of Sant Lluís Primary Care Centre, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-0233
Ana M González-PintoCentre of Biomedical Investigation in Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Spanish Government Carlos III Health Institute, Vitoria, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2568-5179
Julio SanjuánDepartment of Clinic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3174-7927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a growing interest in the use of technology in order to support the treatment of psychotic disorders, limited knowledge exists about the viability and acceptability of these eHealth interventions in relation to the clinical characteristics of patients.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the access and use of, as well as experiences and interest in, new technologies using a survey of patients diagnosed with early psychosis compared with a survey of patients diagnosed with chronic psychotic disorders.

methodsWe designed a structured questionnaire. This questionnaire was divided into five parts: (1) clinical and demographic information, (2) access and use of the internet, (3) use of the internet in relation to mental health, (4) experiences with technology, and (5) patients' interest in eHealth services. In total, 105 patients were recruited from early psychosis units (n=65) and recovery units (n=40).

resultsIn this study, 84.8% (89/105) of the patients had access to the internet and 88.6% (93/105) owned an electronic internet device. In total, 71.3% (57/80) of patients who owned a mobile phone were interested in eHealth systems and 38.2% (37/97) reported negative experiences related to the internet usage. We observed differences between the groups in terms of device ownership (P=.02), the frequency of internet access (P<.001), the use of social media (P=.01), and seeking health information (P=.04); the differences were found to be higher in the early psychosis group. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the use of internet in relation to mental health, experiences and opinions about the internet, or interest in eHealth interventions (P=.43).

conclusionsThe availability and use of technology for the participants in our survey were equivalent to those for the general population. The differences found between the groups in relation to the access or use of technology seemed to due to age-related factors. The use of technology involving mental health and the interest in eHealth interventions were mainly positive and equivalent between the groups. Accordingly, this group of patients is a potential target for the emerging eHealth interventions, regardless of their clinical status. However, 28.7% (23/80) of the studied patients rejected the use of internet interventions and 38.2% (37/97) had unpleasant experiences related to its usage; thus, more in-depth studies are needed to better define the profile of patients with psychosis who may benefit from eHealth treatments.

Indexed as

acceptabilityeHealthinternetmobile phonepsychosisschizophreniaviability

Identifiers

PMID30045835
PMCPMC6083047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.