ArticleJMIR mental health2018
Differences in the Use and Opinions About New eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Psychosis: Structured Questionnaire.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03807388 (The Use of ReMindCare Application for Smartphone in Treatment of Patients From First Episode of Psychosis Unit in the Clinic Hospital of Valencia, Spain.), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of ReMindCare Application for Smartphone in Treatment of Patients From First Episode of Psychosis Unit in the Clinic Hospital of Valencia, Spain.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mobile health in the specific management of first-episode psychosis: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Relationship Between the use of Mobile Applications and Social Functioning in Patients with Schizophrenia.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Preferences of Young Adults With Psychosis for Cannabis-Focused Harm Reduction Interventions: A Cross-Sectional Study: Préférences des jeunes adultes souffrant de psychose pour les interventions de réduction des méfaits axées sur le cannabis : une étude transversale.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2024Article
- The Relationship of Internet, Social Media, and Related Technology Use with Disease Severity and Functionality in Individuals with Serious Mental Disorders.Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Cannabis Harm Reduction Intervention for People With First-Episode Psychosis: Protocol for a Pilot Multicentric Randomized Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Digital tools to support mental health: a survey study in psychosis.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Access and use of digital technology by patients with psychosis at a hospital in South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2023Article
- Social media and schizophrenia: An update on clinical applications.World journal of psychiatry · 2022Review
- Therapeutic Alliance in Online and Face-to-face Psychological Treatment: Comparative Study.JMIR mental health · 2022Article
- Engagement with online psychosocial interventions for psychosis: A review and synthesis of relevant factors.Internet interventions · 2021Review
- Using Digital Tools to Engage Patients With Psychosis and Their Families in Research: Survey Recruitment and Completion in an Early Psychosis Intervention Program.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- Teleconsultation in a coloproctology unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preliminary results.Cirugia espanola · 2021Article
- [Teleconsultation in a coloproctology unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preliminary results].Cirugia espanola · 2021Article
- ReMindCare, an app for daily clinical practice in patients with first episode psychosis: A pragmatic real-world study protocol.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2021Article
- mHealth for Young Adults with Early Psychosis: User Preferences and Their Relationship to Attitudes About Treatment-Seeking.Journal of technology in behavioral science · 2021Article
- ReMindCare App for Early Psychosis: Pragmatic Real World Intervention and Usability Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Perspectives of Young Adults on Receiving Telepsychiatry Services in an Urban Early Intervention Program for First-Episode Psychosis: A Cross-Sectional, Descriptive Survey Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Understanding Implementation of a Digital Self-Monitoring Intervention for Relapse Prevention in Psychosis: Protocol for a Mixed Method Process Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
- Acceptance and Expectations of Medical Experts, Students, and Patients Toward Electronic Mental Health Apps: Cross-Sectional Quantitative and Qualitative Survey Study.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
- Preferences of Information Dissemination on Treatment for Bipolar Disorder: Patient-Centered Focus Group Study.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite a growing interest in the use of technology in order to support the treatment of psychotic disorders, limited knowledge exists about the viability and acceptability of these eHealth interventions in relation to the clinical characteristics of patients.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the access and use of, as well as experiences and interest in, new technologies using a survey of patients diagnosed with early psychosis compared with a survey of patients diagnosed with chronic psychotic disorders.
methodsWe designed a structured questionnaire. This questionnaire was divided into five parts: (1) clinical and demographic information, (2) access and use of the internet, (3) use of the internet in relation to mental health, (4) experiences with technology, and (5) patients' interest in eHealth services. In total, 105 patients were recruited from early psychosis units (n=65) and recovery units (n=40).
resultsIn this study, 84.8% (89/105) of the patients had access to the internet and 88.6% (93/105) owned an electronic internet device. In total, 71.3% (57/80) of patients who owned a mobile phone were interested in eHealth systems and 38.2% (37/97) reported negative experiences related to the internet usage. We observed differences between the groups in terms of device ownership (P=.02), the frequency of internet access (P<.001), the use of social media (P=.01), and seeking health information (P=.04); the differences were found to be higher in the early psychosis group. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the use of internet in relation to mental health, experiences and opinions about the internet, or interest in eHealth interventions (P=.43).
conclusionsThe availability and use of technology for the participants in our survey were equivalent to those for the general population. The differences found between the groups in relation to the access or use of technology seemed to due to age-related factors. The use of technology involving mental health and the interest in eHealth interventions were mainly positive and equivalent between the groups. Accordingly, this group of patients is a potential target for the emerging eHealth interventions, regardless of their clinical status. However, 28.7% (23/80) of the studied patients rejected the use of internet interventions and 38.2% (37/97) had unpleasant experiences related to its usage; thus, more in-depth studies are needed to better define the profile of patients with psychosis who may benefit from eHealth treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.