Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045816›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2018

Goal Directed and Self-Control Systems in Bulimia Nervosa: An fMRI Study.

Rémi Neveu, Dorine Neveu, Edouard Carrier, Aurelia Gay, Alain Nicolas, Giorgio Coricelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06649994 (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Inhibitory Control Training to Reduce Binge Eating), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06649994 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Inhibitory Control Training to Reduce Binge Eating: Brain and Behavioral Changes (BE-NEMOIC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRaquel Vilar LópezRan2024 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsBinge Eating, Inhibition, PsychologicalArmsActive iTBS of the DLPFC, Active iTBS of the vmPFC, iTBS of the vertex (sham), Computerized inhibitory control training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuroimaging and eating disorders.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rémi NeveuCNRS, Université de Lyon, Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France; Praxis, Ville-la-Grand, France.
Dorine NeveuUniversité Montpellier 1, INSERM, U 1058 Montpellier, France.
Edouard CarrierClinique Saint Vincent de Paul, Lyon, France.
Aurelia GayCHU de Saint Etienne, France.
Alain NicolasHôpital du Vinatier, Bron, France.
Giorgio CoricelliCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, CIMeC, University of Trento; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. Electronic address: giorgio.coricelli@usc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBinge eating is apparently the opposite of the strict control over food intake typically set by "maladaptive dieters". Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated the role of goal-directed behaviors, and the related use of self-control, in binge-related food choices in patients with Bulimia Nervosa (BN).

methodWhile undergoing fMRI, women aged 18-35 with BN (N = 35) and healthy control women (N = 26) rated foods for healthiness and tastiness and then made food choices on a 5 points Likert scale between two conflicting options: one food with lower healthiness and higher tastiness (defined as uncontrolled choice) than the other food (defined as controlled choice).

resultsBN and healthy participants made more uncontrolled than controlled choices (63% vs 24% and 65% vs 18% respectively). While healthy participants used only food tastiness (chose tastier foods more often) to make food choices (p < .001), BN patients used both food healthiness (chose unhealthy food more often, p < .001) and food tastiness (p < .001) to make binge-related food choices. Activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), which correlated with food choices (p

interpretationContrary to what might be expected, not only food tastiness but also unhealthiness (a more abstract cognitive-based attribute than food tastiness) plays a role in uncontrolled choices in BN. These choices are likely goal-directed behaviors and recruit self-control.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBulimia NervosaDiet, HealthyFemaleFood PreferencesGoalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSelf-ControlYoung AdultBinge eatingBulimia nervosaDorsolateral prefrontal cortexFood choiceFrontal lobeGoal-oriented valuationSelf-controlVentromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID30045816
PMCPMC6116351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.