Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045692›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

Drugs, distrust and dialogue -a focus group study with Swedish GPs on discharge summary use in primary care.

Gabriella Caleres, Eva Lena Strandberg, Åsa Bondesson, Patrik Midlöv, Sara Modig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriella CaleresDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden. gabriella.caleres@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5296-3656
Eva Lena StrandbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Åsa BondessonDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Patrik MidlövDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Sara ModigDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Malmö University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDischarge summary with medication report effectively counteracts drug-related problems due to insufficient information transfer in care transitions. The benefits of the discharge summary may be lost if it is not adequately used, and factors affecting optimal use by the GP are of interest. Since the views of Swedish GPs are unexplored, this study aimed to explore and understand GPs experiences, perceptions and feelings regarding the use of the discharge summary with medication report.

methodThis qualitative study was based on four focus group discussion with 18 GPs and resident physicians in family medicine which were performed in 2016 and 2017. A semi-structured interview guide was used. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe analysis resulted in three final main themes: "Importance of the discharge summary", "Role of the GP" and "Create dialogue" with six categories; "Benefits for the GP and perceived benefits for the patient", "GP use of the information", "Significance of different documents", "Spider in the web", "Terminus/End station" and "Improved information transfer in care transitions". Overall, the participants described clear benefits with the discharge summary when accurate although perceived deficiencies were also quite rife.

conclusionThe GPs experiences and views of the discharge summary revealed clear benefits regarding mainly medication information, awareness of any plans as well as shared knowledge with the patient. However, perceived deficiencies of the discharge summary affected its use by the GP and enhanced communication was called for.

Indexed as

CommunicationGeneral PractitionersPatient Discharge SummariesPrimary Health CareContinuity of Patient CareFamily PracticeFocus GroupsHumansMedication ReconciliationSwedenTrust

Identifiers

PMID30045692
PMCPMC6060535
OpenAlexW2883064929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.