Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045654›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of men's health2018

Choosing Channels, Sources, and Content for Communicating Prostate Cancer Information to Black Men: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Kim Walsh-Childers, Folakemi Odedina, Alexandria Poitier, Ernest Kaninjing, Greenberry Taylor

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of men's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Development of a prostate cancer survivorship care toolkit for Black men with clinical and contextual tailoring.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Prostate Cancer Survivorship and Advocacy Among Ethnically Diverse Black Men Through Community Town Halls.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding Myeloma-Related Information Needs and Communication Preferences Within Black American Communities: An Exploratory Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Shop Talk: A Qualitative Study to Understand Peer Health-related Communication Among Black Men at the Barbershop.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Self-efficacy to Get Cancer-Related Information or Advice.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Development of a Minority Prostate Cancer Research Digest: Communication Strategy Statement for Black Men.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim Walsh-Childers1 College of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0050-3359
Folakemi Odedina2 College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Alexandria Poitier1 College of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ernest Kaninjing2 College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Greenberry Taylor1 College of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify effective channels, sources, and content approaches for communicating prostate cancer prevention information to Black men. The Web of Science, PubMed and GoogleScholar databases, as well as reviews of reference lists for selected publications, were searched to select articles relevant to cancer communication channels, sources or content for Black men, focused on male-prevalent cancers and published in English. Articles were excluded if they examined only patient-provider communication, dealt exclusively with prostate cancer patients or did not separate findings by race. The selection procedures identified 41 relevant articles, which were systematically and independently reviewed by two team members to extract data on preferred channels, sources, and content for prostate cancer information. This review revealed that Black men prefer interpersonal communication for prostate cancer information; however, video can be effective. Trusted sources included personal physicians, clergy, and other community leaders, family (especially spouses) and prostate cancer survivors. Men want comprehensive information about screening, symptoms, treatment, and outcomes. Messages should be culturally tailored, encouraging empowerment and "ownership" of disease. Black men are open to prostate cancer prevention information through mediated channels when contextualized within spiritual/cultural beliefs and delivered by trusted sources.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAgedBlack or African AmericanConsumer Health InformaticsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOnline SystemsPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsUnited StatesBlack mencancer disparitiescommunication strategiescultural tailoringhealth communicationmedia channelspreventionprostate cancersources

Identifiers

PMID30045654
PMCPMC6142158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.