Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045338›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Relationship between occupational noise exposure and the risk factors of cardiovascular disease in China: A meta-analysis.

Ye Yang, Enguo Zhang, Juan Zhang, Shangya Chen, Gongchang Yu, Xiaoshan Liu, Cheng Peng, Martin F Lavin, Zhongjun Du, Hua Shao

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impacts of hazardous noise levels on hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association of occupational noise exposure with hypertension: A cross-sectional study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Ye YangDepartment of Toxicology, Shandong Academy of Occupational Health and Occupational Medicine School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences Department of Radiology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Affiliated to Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, the University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.
Enguo Zhang
Juan Zhang
Shangya Chen
Gongchang Yu
Xiaoshan Liu
Cheng Peng
Martin F Lavin
Zhongjun Du
Hua Shao
Institute of Occupational Medicine · SGShandong First Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, occupational noise exposure has become one of the risk factors of occupational workers and attracted serious concerned of most of occupational disease researchers. To assess associations of occupational noise exposure and cardiovascular disease by meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Results from primary studies about occupational noise and cardiovascular disease (2000-2017) were retrieved from literatures, which were conducted in China only. Both random and fixed effect model were used to calculate pooled odds ratio (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Review Manager and Stata software were used to perform data analysis. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statements.

resultsAfter applying stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4771 exposures and 3068 controls from 11 primary studies were used to analyze the relationship between occupational noise exposure and cardiovascular disease. The risk of developing high blood pressure for workers exposed to noise is 2.55 times higher than the controls (I = 52%, 95% CI: 1.94-3.36), and electrocardiograph (ECG) abnormality is 2.27 times higher than the control groups (I = 22%, 95% CI: 1.96-2.62). The bias analysis suggested that there is publication bias, but it didn't affect the conclusions from trim test.

conclusionThe impact of high-intensity noise exposure on the worker's cardiovascular system is much greater than that of the unexposed control group, and the effect on hypertension of the exposed group is greater than that of the ECG.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesChinaElectrocardiographyHumansHypertensionNoise, OccupationalOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30045338
PMCPMC6078733
OpenAlexW2883310708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.