Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045335›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in node-positive cervical cancer patients.

Ji Hyeon Joo, Young Seok Kim, Joo-Hyun Nam

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prognostic value of the metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with pancreatic cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji Hyeon JooDepartment of Radiation Oncology Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Seok Kim
Joo-Hyun Nam

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine whether the pelvic lymph node ratio (LNR) has significant prognostic value for survival and disease recurrence in node-positive, early stage cervical cancer patients.The medical records of 872 consecutive women who received postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were reviewed. Of these, 397 women with pathologically proven lymph nodal metastasis were included in this analysis and categorized into 3 groups according to their LNR: low (<0.1, n = 251), intermediate (0.1-0.4, n = 121), and high (>0.4, n = 25). The association between LNR and oncological outcome was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis.A total of 13,491 LNs were retrieved from 397 women, with a median harvest of 32 nodes per patient. There was a strong positive correlation between the number of metastatic LNs and LNR (r = 0.83, P < .01). With a median follow-up duration of 48 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 73% and 67%, respectively. The OS and DFS curves among the pelvic LNR groups significantly differed: the 5-year OS rates of the low, intermediate, and high pelvic LNR groups were 83%, 66%, and 17% (P < .01), and the 5-year DFS rates were 77%, 56%, and 20% (P < .01), respectively.LNR is an important prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with uterine cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30045335
PMCPMC6078754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.