Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045291›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2018

Proportional dose of rapid-onset opioid in breakthrough cancer pain management: An open-label, multicenter study.

Tsung-Yu Yen, Jeng-Fong Chiou, Wei-Yong Chiang, Wen-Hao Su, Ming-Yuan Huang, Ming-Hung Hu, Shen-Chi Wu, Yuen-Liang Lai

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Once again... breakthrough cancer pain: an updated overview.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Effects of age and gender in patients receiving doses of opioids for breakthrough pain proportional to background opioid doses.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tsung-Yu YenDepartment of Radiation Oncology Hospice and Palliative Care Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Department of Palliative Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cardinal Tien Hospital School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei Department of Hospice and Palliative Care, Taipei MacKay Medical College, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Jeng-Fong Chiou
Wei-Yong Chiang
Wen-Hao Su
Ming-Yuan Huang
Ming-Hung Hu
Shen-Chi Wu
Yuen-Liang Lai
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWCardinal Tien Hospital · TWColorado Center For Hospice and Palliative Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of breakthrough pain (BTP) in cancer patients is a challenge. It is clinically useful to evaluate the effectiveness of rapid-onset opioid at a starting dose in proportional to the background opioid regimen. This open-label, multicenter, noncomparative study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of proportional doses of fentanyl buccal soluble film (FBSF) in patients with breakthrough cancer pain.

methodsThirty patients aged 20 to 70, experiencing 1 to 3 BTP per day, receiving regimens equivalent to 60 to 360 mg/day of oral morphine or 25 to 150 μg/h of transdermal fentanyl ≥1 week, were prospectively recruited. FBSF was administered proportionally based on their current opioid regimen for baseline pain. The percentage of patients requiring dose titration was evaluated. For each BTP episode, changes in pain intensity at 30 minutes (PID30) after dosing, patient's satisfaction, the percentage of episodes requiring rescue medication, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

resultsThe percentage of patients who required dose titration was 21.4% (6/28) and 12.0% (3/25) in the full analysis set and per-protocol populations, respectively. The average PID30 was 3.9, and a pain score ≤3 was achieved in 95.1% of the events. Eight out of 367 (2.2%) BTP episodes needed rescue medication. The majority of subjects (75.8%) rated their experience of pain management as good to excellent. A total of 6 drug-related AEs were reported by 3 (10.7%) patients in the safety population.

conclusionsFBSF dose in proportional to the regimen of opioid for baseline pain management is efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of cancer patients with BTP.

Indexed as

Administration, BuccalAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidBreakthrough PainCancer PainDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFentanylHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidFentanyl

Identifiers

PMID30045291
PMCPMC6078661
OpenAlexW2884592274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.