Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045134›Full record

Observational studyRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2019

OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY, FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY, AND DIAGNOSIS OF CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

Vincent Gualino, Ramin Tadayoni, Salomon Yves Cohen, Ali Erginay, Franck Fajnkuchen, Belkacem Haouchine, Valérie Krivosic, Gabriel Quentel, Eric Vicaut, Alain Gaudric

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Multimodality Fusion Strategies in Eye Disease Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vincent GualinoOphthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Ramin TadayoniOphthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Salomon Yves CohenCentre d'Imagerie et de Laser, Paris, France.
Ali ErginayOphthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Franck FajnkuchenCentre d'Imagerie et de Laser, Paris, France.
Belkacem HaouchineOphthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Valérie KrivosicOphthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Gabriel QuentelCentre d'Imagerie et de Laser, Paris, France.
Eric VicautClinical Research Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Alain GaudricOphthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the sensitivity and specificity of different retinal imaging combinations for the diagnosis of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration.

methodsPatients aged 50 years or older referred for suspicious recent-onset CNV related to age-related macular degeneration were prospectively included for 6 months. Data recorded included color fundus photographs (CFPs), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FA) images. Five retina specialists randomly interpreted SD-OCT combined with CFP, and then FA combined with CFP. The reference diagnosis of CNV was based on the agreement of two readers in the interpretation of the SD-OCT + FA + CFP combination.

resultsOne hundred and forty-eight patients (148 eyes) were included. For the diagnosis of CNV, the sensitivity of both SD-OCT + CFP and FA + CFP was of 90.9%. Type 2 CNV was diagnosed in 98% to 100% of cases with SD-OCT + CFP or FA + CFP, whereas Type 1 CNV was diagnosed in 82.9% of cases with SD-OCT + CFP and 81.6% with FA + CFP.

conclusionWhen used as a first diagnostic test, SD-OCT combined with CFP had sensitivity and specificity similar to those of FA combined with CFP, for the diagnosis of CNV in age-related macular degeneration. This shows the increasingly important role of SD-OCT as a first-line test in the diagnosis of CNV.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChoroidal NeovascularizationFluorescein AngiographyHumansMacular DegenerationMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID30045134
PMCPMC6727912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.