ArticleCardiorenal medicine2018
Hyponatremia in Acute Heart Failure in Relation to Hematocrit Levels: Clinical Relevance and Prognostic Implication.
Article in Cardiorenal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyponatraemia in heart failure: a mechanistic approach to contemporary management.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- A new scoring system for predicting short-term outcomes in Chinese patients with critically-ill acute decompensated heart failure.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Hyperuricemia complicated with acute kidney injury is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with severely decompensated acute heart failure.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019Article
- The combined impact of hyponatremia and hematocrit on the risk for 90-day readmission and death in patients with heart failure: dilutional hyponatremia versus depletional hyponatremia.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality found in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure (AHF) and is related to poor prognosis. This study sought to evaluate: (1) the different prognostic impact of dilutional versus depletional hyponatremia, evaluating short- and long-term outcome; (2) the relationship between both types of hyponatremia and intravenous furosemide dose, renal function changes, and persistent congestion at discharge.
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 233 consecutive patients with a primary diagnosis of AHF. Hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium < 135 mEq/L, which could be either dilutional (hematocrit < 35%) or depletional (hematocrit ≥35%). Persistent congestion was defined as a congestion score ≥2 at discharge. Patients were followed 180 days for occurrence of death or rehospitalization for AHF.
resultsHyponatremia was present in 68/233 patients with 27 cases classified as dilutional hyponatremia versus 41 as depletional. The proportion of patients with persistent congestion was higher in the dilutional hyponatremia group, but similar in the depletional hyponatremia group (52 vs. 81 vs. 58%; p = 0.02). After adjustment for important baseline characteristics, dilutional hyponatremia was significantly associated with the risk of death or rehospitalization for AHF at 60 days (HR 2.17 [1.08-4.37]; p = 0.03) and 180 days (HR 1.88 [1.10-3.21]; p = 0.02). In contrast, depletional hyponatremia was only significantly associated with the same endpoint at 180 days (HR 1.64 [1.05-2.57]; p = 0.03).
conclusionsLow hematocrit levels in AHF patients with hyponatremia characterize a population that is more difficult to decongest and has poor clinical outcome. In contrast, patients with hyponatremia but normal hematocrit are better decongested and have better short-term outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.