Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30044846›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

The effect of a fibrin sealant on knee function after total knee replacement surgery. Results from the FIRST trial. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Wiebe C Verra, Joost A van Hilten, Áine Honohan, Erik W van Zwet, Johanna G van der Bom, Rob G H H Nelissen, FIRST-research group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wiebe C VerraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-7542
Joost A van HiltenCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Áine HonohanCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Erik W van ZwetDepartment of Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Johanna G van der BomCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob G H H NelissenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
FIRST-research group
Leiden University Medical Center · NLSanquin · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee replacement (TKR) is increasingly performed in short term hospital stay, making same day mobilization an important issue is after surgery. This implies little joint effusion by reducing intra-articular blood loss, which will enhance knee range of motion. The application of a topical fibrin sealant on the intraoperative bare bone and synovial tissue may contribute to better early full mobilization and thus improved functional outcomes. Since ambulation with a fully extended knee is less strenuous, we hypothesized that patients who received fibrin sealant would demonstrate improved early knee extension after six weeks compared to patients who received standard care.

methodsA multicenter randomized controlled trial in a consecutive series of osteoarthritis patients scheduled for TKR surgery. Participants were randomized to receive fibrin sealant or not before closing the knee joint capsule. Primary outcome was change in knee extension angle(°) at short term (2 weeks) follow-up (cExt). Secondary outcomes were 6-week extension angle, knee flexion angle, hemoglobin loss, blood transfusion rates, complication rates, the Knee Society Score, and the KOOS and EQ5D questionnaires.

resultsWhen data on primary outcome became available from 250 patients, an interim analysis was performed by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board for safety and effectivity assessment. This analysis showed that sufficient patients were included to detect a cExt of 10° between both groups. Inclusion was stopped however, all in the meantime included patients were treated according to their randomization. A total of 466 were available for analysis. Both groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. The estimated mean cExt difference was 0.2° (95%CI -0.5 to 0.9). No differences in secondary outcomes were found.

conclusionsNo beneficial effects or side effects were found of a topically applied fibrin sealant during TKR surgery. These results discourage the clinical use of a fibrin sealant in TKR.

trial registrationDutch Trial Register, NTR2500.

Indexed as

Prosthesis DesignAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionFemaleFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHemostaticsHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOsteoarthritisFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHemostatics

Identifiers

PMID30044846
PMCPMC6059473
OpenAlexW2883120908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.