Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30044845›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

"Free Testing and PrEP without Outing Myself to Parents:" Motivation to participate in oral and injectable PrEP clinical trials among adolescent men who have sex with men.

Celia B Fisher, Adam L Fried, Leah Ibrahim Puri, Kathryn Macapagal, Brian Mustanski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Experiences of Successful PrEP Uptake Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Men in the United States: A Qualitative Exploration.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Addressing Explanation of Benefits as a Barrier to PrEP for Adolescents in Public Health Entities.The undergraduate journal of public health at the University of Michigan · 2022
    Article
  13. Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Long-Acting Injectable PrEP Research Trials for MSM, Transgender Women, and Gender-Nonconforming People of Color.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Surveillance studies involving HIV testing are needed: Will at-risk youth participate?Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Celia B FisherCenter for Ethics Education, Fordham University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3849-7281
Adam L FriedClinical Psychology Department, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona, United States of America.
Leah Ibrahim PuriCenter for Ethics Education, Fordham University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Kathryn MacapagalFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Brian MustanskiFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Fordham University · USNorthwestern University · USMidwestern University · US

Funding

Ethics in HIV Prevention Research Involving LGBT YouthR01MD009561 · NIMHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI FISHER, CELIA B, MUSTANSKI, BRIAN · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD009561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent men who have sex with men (AMSM) account for disproportionately high numbers of new HIV diagnoses. Non-adherence to daily use limiting the effectiveness of oral PrEP (Truvada) has led to current trials with adult MSM testing Cabotegravir, a long-term injectable medication. Once comparative studies with young adult MSM have established relative safety and efficacy of these medications, there will be a need for such comparative trials involving adolescents. Trends in state laws and IRB protocol review indicate that many of these studies will permit youth to provide independent consent for participation. Understanding the motivations of AMSM to participate in HIV biomedical prevention studies is important to ensure their agreement is voluntary without misunderstanding and undue influence. This study examined AMSM attitudes toward participation in oral/injectable PrEP RCTs to inform protections of youth's rights and welfare in future studies.

methodsWe administered to 198 ethnically diverse U.S. AMSM, 14-17 years, a web-based survey including demographic and sexual health questions, description of a year-long oral versus injectable PrEP RCT and 26 Likert-type and one open-ended item assessing motivations for and against participation including: perceived benefits and risks of PrEP; free HIV/STI testing and counseling; confidentiality concerns; random assignment; and benefit to others.

resultsSixty-two percent indicated they were likely to participate in the study. The majority endorsed daily HIV protection, free HIV/STI testing, sexual health counseling, not having to rely on partner's condom use, and altruism as reasons to participate. Reasons against participation included medication side effects, concern taking the pill daily and clinic visits would reveal their sexual orientation and behaviors to parents. Over half erroneously assumed they would be assigned to the condition best for them and 39% indicated free access to services would lead them to participate even if they did not want to. Multiple regression indicated these factors accounted for 55% of the variance in participation choice. Nether age or ethnicity yielded significance.

conclusionsResults suggest future biomedical HIV prevention research will need to develop procedures to address AMSM's confidentiality concerns, enhance youth's understanding of random assignment, the continued importance of medication adherence and partner condom use during trial participation, and availability of alternative sexual health services to avoid the potentially undue influence of access to free sexual health services.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAnti-HIV AgentsClinical Trials as TopicEmtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug CombinationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansInjectionsMaleMotivationPatient ParticipationPre-Exposure ProphylaxisPsychology, AdolescentSexual and Gender MinoritiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID30044845
PMCPMC6059443
OpenAlexW2884834614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.