Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30044832›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Optimization of multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction based on response surface methodology and an artificial neural network-genetic algorithm approach.

Ping Pan, Weifeng Jin, Xiaohong Li, Yi Chen, Jiahui Jiang, Haitong Wan, Daojun Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ping PanHangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Weifeng JinCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaohong LiCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yi ChenHangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiahui JiangHangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Haitong WanCollege of Life Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Daojun YuHangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0855-7420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has found an increasing range of applications. The construction of a reliable and dynamic mathematical model for multiplex qPCR that analyzes the effects of interactions between variables is therefore especially important. This work aimed to analyze the effects of interactions between variables through response surface method (RSM) for uni- and multiplex qPCR, and further optimize the parameters by constructing two mathematical models via RSM and back-propagation neural network-genetic algorithm (BPNN-GA) respectively. The statistical analysis showed that Mg2+ was the most important factor for both uni- and multiplex qPCR. Dynamic models of uni- and multiplex qPCR could be constructed using both RSM and BPNN-GA methods. But RSM was better than BPNN-GA on prediction performance in terms of the mean absolute error (MAE), the mean square error (MSE) and the Coefficient of Determination (R2). Ultimately, optimal parameters of uni- and multiplex qPCR were determined by RSM.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerEscherichia coliMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID30044832
PMCPMC6059488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.