ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse.
Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomised Trial on the Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical Restoration and Female Sexual Functions.International urogynecology journal · 2024Trial
- Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Current Perspectives and Decision-Making Considerations for Surgical Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Comparison of 1-year outcomes after uterine-preserving laparoscopic pectopexy using an inverted T-shaped mesh versus the horizontal DynaMesh: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Observational
- Clinical application of laparoscopic pectopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: efficacy and safety.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A Novel Technique to Manage Pelvic Organ Prolapse; An Original Study in Asian Women in Rural Area.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
- Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Pectopexy versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of laparoscopic pectopexy with the standard laparoscopic sacropexy for apical prolapse: an exploratory randomized controlled trialJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2023Article
- Hemorrhage Occluder™ Pin to control life-threatening bleeding during the removal of an infected sacrocolpopexy mesh: A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic pectopexy with native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Article
- Laparoscopic pectopexy for patients with intraabdominal adhesions, lumbar spinal procedures, and other contraindications to sacrocolpopexy: a case series.AJOG global reports · 2022Article
- Perioperative and Long-Term Anatomical and Subjective Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension for POP-Q Stages II-IV Apical Prolapse.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A biomechanical analysis of different meshes for reconstructions of the pelvic floor in the porcine model.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Mesh-less laparoscopic treatment of apical prolapse.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic Pectopexy-CUSUM Learning Curve and Perioperative Complications Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Initial Experience of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Apical Prolapse in South Korea.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after open sacrocervicopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Rectal injury during laparoscopic mesh removal after sacrocervicopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate differences in perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of patients who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy / sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic sa-crocolpopexy / sacrohysteropexy, or laparoscopic pectopexy due to apical prolapse. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on 110 patients who underwent apical prolapse surgery between January 1, 2011, and July 31, 2017. Only symp-tomatic uterine or vaginal vault prolapse patients with stage 2-4, according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system, were included. Baseline and intraoperative variables of groups; perioperative complications, including hemorrhage, urinary, and wound complications, blood transfusion, ileus, and short-term outcomes were compared.
resultsA total of 68 abdominal sacrocolpopexies (44 sacrocolpopexies and 24 sa-crohysteropexies), 14 laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies (10 sacrocolpopexies and 4 sa-crohysteropexies), and 28 laparoscopic pectopexies (16 pectopexies and 12 pectohys-teropexies) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics and intraoperative variables were similar. However, the mean operating time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic pectopexy group (74.9 min) when compared with that of the other groups (p < 0.01). During the six-month follow-up period, no prolapse recurrence and mesh erosion / exposure were observed in any group. De-novo stress urinary incontinence, urgency, and defecation problems, as well as perioperative complication rates, were not statistically significantly different between the groups.
conclusionsAlthough the complication rates and short-term outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, minimally invasive approaches were associated with reduced procedural-related morbidity. Laparoscopic pectopexy is a promising endoscopic prolapse surgery and can be an alternative technique to sacrocolpopexy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.