Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30044431›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Placing Health Warnings on E-Cigarettes: A Standardized Protocol.

Jennifer R Mendel, Marissa G Hall, Sabeeh A Baig, Michelle Jeong, Noel T Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Educating the Public on the Health Risks of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes: Results From a US-Based Convenience Sample.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Youth Exposure and Response to the FDA Health Warning Label on Electronic Cigarettes Packaging: Policy Implications.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Bayesian Inference: An Introduction to Hypothesis Testing Using Bayes Factors.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer R MendelLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. jrmendel@unc.edu.
Marissa G HallLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. mghall@unc.edu.
Sabeeh A BaigDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. sbaig1@live.unc.edu.
Michelle JeongLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. mjeong@email.unc.edu.
Noel T BrewerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. ntb@unc.edu.

Funding

Training & Education Program p294-308P50CA180907 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RIBISL, KURT M. · 2013 to 2017
$20.2M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180907NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health warnings for e-cigarettes are a promising and novel tobacco control intervention for reducing e-cigarette use. We developed a new protocol for evaluating e-cigarette warnings by placing them on users' own devices to reflect real-world exposure. Study 1 participants were a national convenience sample of 606 U.S. adult e-cigarette users surveyed online in March 2017. Most Study 1 participants were willing to have their e-cigarette devices (87%) and refills (83%) labeled. Study 2 participants were a convenience sample of 22 adult e-cigarette users recruited in California, United States in April 2017. We applied the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's proposed e-cigarette warning to users' own devices and refills. Most Study 2 participants (81%) reported using e-cigarette devices with our warning labels at least 90% of the time during the study. Nearly all (95%) said they would participate in the study again, and 100% would recommend the study to a friend. Conversations about e-cigarette harms, conversations about quitting e-cigarettes, and intentions to quit using e-cigarettes increased during the study (all

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsProduct LabelingSmokingAdolescentAdultCaliforniaFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTruth DisclosureUnited StatesYoung Adultaddictionchemicalconstituente-cigarettemessagingwarning

Identifiers

PMID30044431
PMCPMC6122039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.