Addressing HIV criminalization: science confronts ignorance and bias.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Explicitly sexing health security: analysing the downstream effects of Panama's sex-segregated COVID-19 disease control policy.Health policy and planning · 2022
   Article
2. COVID-19 Policies can Perpetuate Violence Against Transgender Communities: Insights from Peru.AIDS and behavior · 2020
   Article
3. A Syndemic Model of Exchange Sex Among HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men.Archives of sexual behavior · 2020
   Article
4. Historical and Current Trends in HIV Criminalization in South Carolina: Implications for the Southern HIV Epidemic.AIDS and behavior · 2019
   Article
5. Addressing HIV criminalization: science confronts ignorance and bias.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Expert consensus statement on the science of HIV in the context of criminal law.2018

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as