Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30043994›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2018

Open or endovascular revascularization in the treatment of acute lower limb ischaemia.

O Grip, A Wanhainen, K Michaëlsson, L Lindhagen, M Björck

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04730310 (Association of Anesthesia Technique With Graft Patency Rates After Open Lower Limb Revascularization), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04730310 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Association of Anesthesia Technique With Graft Patency Rates After Open Lower Limb Revascularization: a Retrospective Population Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled8,893ConditionsRegional Anesthesia, Vascular Grafting, Vascular PatencyArmsNSQIP Lower Extremity Open (LEO) procedure-targeted dataset (i.e. undergoing Lower extremity open revascularization) from 2014-2019
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanical thrombectomy for inferior vena cava tumor thrombus secondary to renal cell carcinoma.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O GripDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9559-8372
A WanhainenDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala, Sweden.
K MichaëlssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Orthopaedics, Uppsala, Sweden.
L LindhagenUCR - Uppsala Clinical Research Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
M BjörckDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsensus is lacking regarding intervention for patients with acute lower limb ischaemia (ALI). The aim was to study amputation-free survival in patients treated for ALI by either primary open or endovascular revascularization.

methodsThe Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) was combined with the Population Registry and National Patient Registry to determine follow-up on mortality and amputation rates. Revascularization techniques were compared by propensity score matching 1 : 1.

resultsOf 9736 patients who underwent open surgery and 6493 who had endovascular treatment between 1994 and 2014, 3365 remained in each group after propensity score matching. Results are from the matched cohort only. Mean age of the patients was 74·7 years; 47·5 per cent were women and mean follow-up was 4·3 years. At 30-day follow-up, the endovascular group had better patency (83·0 versus 78·6 per cent; P < 0·001). Amputation rates were similar at 30 days (7·0 per cent in the endovascular group versus 8·2 per cent in the open group; P = 0·113) and at 1 year (13·8 versus 14·8 per cent; P = 0·320). The mortality rate was lower after endovascular treatment, at 30 days (6·7 versus 11·1 per cent; P < 0·001) and after 1 year (20·2 versus 28·6 per cent; P < 0·001). Accordingly, endovascular treatment had better amputation-free survival at 30 days (87·5 versus 82·1 per cent; P < 0·001) and 1 year (69·9 versus 61·1 per cent; P < 0·001). The number needed to treat to prevent one death within the first year was 12 with an endovascular compared with an open approach. Five years after surgery, endovascular treatment still had improved survival (HR 0·78, 99 per cent c.i. 0·70 to 0·86) but the difference between the treatment groups occurred mainly in the first year.

conclusionPrimary endovascular treatment for ALI appeared to reduce mortality compared with open surgery, without any difference in the risk of amputation.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAmputation, SurgicalEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIschemiaLegMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesReperfusionSwedenTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30043994
PMCPMC6221085
OpenAlexW2903114610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.