Trial reportMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2019
Efficacy and safety of ozanimod in multiple sclerosis: Dose-blinded extension of a randomized phase II study.
Trial report in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01628393 (A Phase 2/3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2/3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled (Part A) and Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled (Part B), Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RPC1063 Administered Orally to Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety of S1P Modulators in Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drug safety · 2021Pooled it
- Long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Final analysis of the DAYBREAK open-label extension trial.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2025Trial
- Long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Up to 5 years of follow-up in the DAYBREAK open-label extension trial.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022Trial
- Effect of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator ozanimod on leukocyte subtypes in relapsing MS.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020Trial
- Cardiac arrhythmias associated with S1PRMs: a pharmacovigilance study based on real-world data.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Evaluating Cognitive Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis: Real-World Impact of Ozanimod on Processing Speed Using BICAMS.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Review
- Case Report: Asymptomatic macular edema in ozanimod.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Disease Modifying Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: New Rays of Hope to Combat Disability?Current neuropharmacology · 2024Review
- Arginine vasopressin hormone receptor antagonists in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis rodent models: A new approach for human multiple sclerosis treatment.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Sphingosine 1-phosphate modulation and immune cell trafficking in inflammatory bowel disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Review
- Review article: the sphingosine 1 phosphate/sphingosine 1 phosphate receptor axis - a unique therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel disease.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2022Review
- OzEAN Study to Collect Real-World Evidence of Persistent Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Ozanimod Over 5 Years in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Germany.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Review
- Review
- Ozanimod to Treat Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: A Comprehensive Review of Disease, Drug Efficacy and Side Effects.Neurology international · 2020Review
- Neurological immunotherapy in the era of COVID-19 - looking for consensus in the literature.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2020Review
- Sphingosine-1-Phosphate: Its Pharmacological Regulation and the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review Article.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Ozanimod: First Approval.Drugs · 2020Review
- Resolution of inflammation: from basic concepts to clinical application.Seminars in immunopathology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOzanimod, an oral immunomodulator, selectively targets sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors 1 and 5.
objectiveEvaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis.
methodsIn the RADIANCE Part A phase II study (NCT01628393), participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily ozanimod hydrochloride (0.5 or 1 mg) or placebo. After 24 weeks, participants could enter a 2-year, dose-blinded extension. Ozanimod-treated participants continued their assigned dose; placebo participants were re-randomized (1:1) to ozanimod hydrochloride 0.5 or 1 mg (equivalent to ozanimod 0.46 and 0.92 mg).
resultsA total of 223 (89.6%) of the 249 participants completed the blinded extension. At 2 years of the extension, the percentage of participants who were gadolinium-enhancing lesion-free ranged from 86.5% to 94.6%. Unadjusted annualized relapse rate during the blinded extension (week 24-end of treatment) was 0.32 for ozanimod hydrochloride 0.5 mg → ozanimod hydrochloride 0.5 mg, 0.18 for ozanimod hydrochloride 1 mg → ozanimod hydrochloride 1 mg, 0.30 for placebo → ozanimod hydrochloride 0.5 mg, and 0.18 for placebo → ozanimod hydrochloride 1 mg. No second-degree or higher atrioventricular block or serious opportunistic infection was reported.
conclusionOzanimod demonstrated sustained efficacy in participants continuing treatment up to 2 years and reached similar efficacy in participants who switched from placebo; no unexpected safety signals emerged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.