Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30043515›Full record

SynthesisReviews in medical virology2018

Can we distinguish respiratory viral infections based on clinical features? A prospective pediatric cohort compared to systematic literature review.

Xiaolin Ma, Tim Conrad, Maren Alchikh, Janine Reiche, Brunhilde Schweiger, Barbara Rath

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in medical virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaolin MaDepartment of Pediatrics, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9446-8904
Tim ConradDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5590-5726
Maren AlchikhDepartment of Pediatrics, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9911-7126
Janine ReicheNational Reference Centre for Influenza, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2541-1095
Brunhilde SchweigerNational Reference Centre for Influenza, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4847-9199
Barbara RathVienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5181-8417

Funding

Chinese Scholarship Council 201508080019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have shown that the predictive value of "clinical diagnoses" of influenza and other respiratory viral infections is low, especially in children. In routine care, pediatricians often resort to clinical diagnoses, even in the absence of robust evidence-based criteria. We used a dual approach to identify clinical characteristics that may help to differentiate infections with common pathogens including influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, bocavirus-1, coronaviruses, or parainfluenza virus: (a) systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 clinical studies published in Medline (June 1996 to March 2017, PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017059557) comprising 49 858 individuals and (b) data-driven analysis of an inception cohort of 6073 children with ILI (aged 0-18 years, 56% male, December 2009 to March 2015) examined at the point of care in addition to blinded PCR testing. We determined pooled odds ratios for the literature analysis and compared these to odds ratios based on the clinical cohort dataset. This combined analysis suggested significant associations between influenza and fever or headache, as well as between respiratory syncytial virus infection and cough, dyspnea, and wheezing. Similarly, literature and cohort data agreed on significant associations between HMPV infection and cough, as well as adenovirus infection and fever. Importantly, none of the abovementioned features were unique to any particular pathogen but were also observed in association with other respiratory viruses. In summary, our "real-world" dataset confirmed published literature trends, but no individual feature allows any particular type of viral infection to be ruled in or ruled out. For the time being, laboratory confirmation remains essential. More research is needed to develop scientifically validated decision models to inform best practice guidelines and targeted diagnostic algorithms.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Studies as TopicCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansInfantInfant, NewbornOdds RatioRespiratory Tract InfectionsSymptom AssessmentVirus Diseaseschildrenclinical symptomsrespiratory viruses

Identifiers

PMID30043515
PMCPMC7169127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.