Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2018
Plerixafor for mobilization and collection of haematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a randomized phase 2 study.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02221492 (A Randomized, Open-label, Two-arm Parallel Group, Comparative Study for Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Subcutaneous Injection of Plerixafor Plus G-CSF for Mobilization and Collection of Peripheral Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Japanese Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Open-label, Two-arm Parallel Group, Comparative Study for Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Subcutaneous Injection of Plerixafor Plus G-CSF for Mobilization and Collection of Peripheral Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Japanese Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- G-CSF + plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilized hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Low Dose Cyclophospahamide is a Feasable Mobilization Regimen in the Covid-19 Era: A Single Center Study from Türkiye.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Plerixafor for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Post-Marketing Surveillance Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2022Article
- The Anti-Angiogenic Effects of Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drugs.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Efficacy and safety of plerixafor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization for autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- Plerixafor use in autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: Experience from a single center in Southern India.Asian journal of transfusion scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02221492) was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of plerixafor for the mobilization and collection of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for autologous transplantation in Japanese non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. In this randomized phase 2 study, patients received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) 400 µg/m²/day for up to 8 days. Starting on the evening of day 4, patients received, for up to 4 days, either plerixafor (240 µg/kg/day) in the G-CSF+ plerixafor arm (GP arm) or G-CSF alone arm (G arm). On day 5, daily apheresis started and was continued for up to 4 days, or until ≥ 5 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.