Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30043267›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2018

Conjunctival MUC5AC+ goblet cell index: relationship with corneal nerves and dry eye.

Cecilia Chao, Blanka Golebiowski, Fiona Stapleton, Xiangtian Zhou, Shihao Chen, Michele C Madigan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of goblet cell size and density in relation to epithelial cell (multi)layering on conjunctival impression cytology samples.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecilia ChaoSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Blanka GolebiowskiSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Fiona StapletonSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Xiangtian ZhouSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Shihao ChenSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. chenle@rocketmail.com.
Michele C MadiganSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the relative proportion of conjunctival MUC5AC+ and MUC5AC- goblet cells in a post-LASIK population and their association with dry eye indicators and corneal nerve morphology using a MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index.

methodsTwenty subjects who had undergone LASIK > 12 months previously and 20 age-matched controls were recruited. Dry eye symptoms, tear breakup time, osmolarity, meniscus area and corneal nerve morphology were examined. Conjunctival impression cytology samples were collected from inferior-temporal bulbar conjunctiva using Millicell® inserts. Total goblet cell density was determined from positive cytokeratin-7 (CK7) immunolabelling; MUC5AC+ goblet cell density was determined from both CK7+- and MUC5AC+-immunolabelled cells. The ratio of MUC5AC+ to total density was defined as the "MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index". Differences in variables between groups and the associations between goblet cell variables and clinical assessments were examined.

resultsNo significant differences in the total and MUC5AC+ goblet cell density and tear film parameters were found between groups, although greater ocular discomfort was reported in the post-LASIK group (P = 0.02). A higher MUC5AC+ Index was associated with worse/greater dry eye symptoms (ρ = 0.55, P = 0.01) and higher nerve tortuosity (ρ = 0.57, P = 0.01) in the post-LASIK group; lower nerve density and thickness was found in controls (ρ > -0.45, P < 0.05), but not associated with tear film parameters.

conclusionsThe MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index provides an indicator of mucin secretion for assessing the goblet cell function in dry eye. In the post-LASIK participants, we found an increased MUC5AC+ Index associated with worse dry eye symptoms and adverse changes in corneal nerve morphology.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCell CountConjunctivaCorneaDry Eye SyndromesFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectGoblet CellsHumansKeratomileusis, Laser In SituLasers, ExcimerMaleMucin 5ACMyopiaTrigeminal NerveMUC5AC protein, humanMucin 5ACCorneal nerve morphologyDry eye symptomsGoblet cell densityMUC5ACPost-LASIK

Identifiers

PMID30043267
OpenAlexW2884868591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.