Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30043168›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

Clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Zijia Song, You Li, Kun Liu, Yimei Jiang, Yiqing Shi, Xiaopin Ji, Tao Zhang, Haoxuan Wu, Yi Shi, Ren Zhao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03633539 (Multi-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of the Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03633539 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Multi-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of the Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2020 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms, Colon DiseaseArmsSingle-incision Laparoscopic Surgery, Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zijia Song *Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
You Li *Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201801, China.
Kun LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201801, China.
Yimei JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201801, China.
Yiqing ShiDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201801, China.
Xiaopin JiDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Haoxuan WuDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Yi ShiDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Ren ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. rjzhaoren@139.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9145-5507
Ruijin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for right colon cancer is going to be considered as a new option. The potential benefits, clinical, and oncologic outcomes are still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for right colon cancer using propensity score matching analysis.

methodsFrom December 2013 to June 2017, 174 patients underwent laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy through a single-incision (n = 32) or a conventional (n = 142) approach. The data were prospectively collected and the patients were matched at a radio of 1:1 according to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous abdominal surgeries, comorbidities, ASA score (≤ 2/> 2), and pathologic stage.

resultsNo significant differences were observed in estimated blood loss, time to diet, postoperative pain score, length of hospital stay between the SILS and CLS groups. However, the SILS group showed longer operation time (175 (40) vs 145 (52.5), p = 0.011) and shorter incision length (4 (1.4) vs 7 (1.9), p < 0.001). There were 2 (6.3%) postoperative complications in the SILS group and 5 (15.6%) in the CLS group (p = 0.426). The pathologic outcomes were similar between two groups. The median follow-up period was 26.5 months in the SILS group and 34.9 months in the CLS group (p = 0.002). There were 3 recurrences (9.4%) in the SILS group and 3 (9.4%) in the CLS group. The 3-year disease-free survival rates were 92.4 and 93.8% (p = 0.984), and overall survival rates were 92.3 and 93.0% (p = 0.884) in the SILS and the CLS groups, respectively. No incisional hernia was observed during the follow-up period.

conclusionsThough single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer showed longer operation time in this study, it appears to be a safe and feasible option with comparable clinical and oncologic outcomes to conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Loss, SurgicalColectomyColonic NeoplasmsDietFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative PainPropensity ScoreSurvival RateTime FactorsClinical outcomesColon cancerConventional laparoscopic surgeryOncologic outcomesSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30043168
OpenAlexW2884509025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.