Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30043100›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2018

Modeling pathogenesis of emergent and pre-emergent human coronaviruses in mice.

Adam S Cockrell, Sarah R Leist, Madeline G Douglas, Ralph S Baric

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Neurological, neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental complications of COVID-19.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?Environmental chemistry letters · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Neuromechanisms of SARS-CoV-2: A Review.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Broad-spectrum coronavirus antiviral drug discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam S CockrellDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. adam_cockrell@unc.edu.
Sarah R LeistDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Madeline G DouglasDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Ralph S BaricDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. rbaric@email.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Mechanisms of MERS-CoV Entry, Cross-species Transmission and PathogenesisR01AI110700 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BARIC, RALPH S, LI, FANG · 2015 to 2024
$7.4M
Receptor recognition mechanisms of coronavirusesR01AI089728 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Fang Li, Timothy Patrick Sheahan · 2010 to 2026
$4.7M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AI089728National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AI098728NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of highly pathogenic human coronaviruses (hCoVs) in the last two decades has illuminated their potential to cause high morbidity and mortality in human populations and disrupt global economies. Global pandemic concerns stem from their high mortality rates, capacity for human-to-human spread by respiratory transmission, and complete lack of approved therapeutic countermeasures. Limiting disease may require the development of virus-directed and host-directed therapeutic strategies due to the acute etiology of hCoV infections. Therefore, understanding how hCoV-host interactions cause pathogenic outcomes relies upon mammalian models that closely recapitulate the pathogenesis of hCoVs in humans. Pragmatism has largely been the driving force underpinning mice as highly effective mammalian models for elucidating hCoV-host interactions that govern pathogenesis. Notably, tractable mouse genetics combined with hCoV reverse genetic systems has afforded the concomitant manipulation of virus and host genetics to evaluate virus-host interaction networks in disease. In addition to assessing etiologies of known hCoVs, mouse models have clinically predictive value as tools to appraise potential disease phenotypes associated with pre-emergent CoVs. Knowledge of CoV pathogenic potential before it crosses the species barrier into the human population provides a highly desirable preclinical platform for addressing global pathogen preparedness, an overarching directive of the World Health Organization. Although we recognize that results obtained in robust mouse models require evaluation in non-human primates, we focus this review on the current state of hCoV mouse models, their use as tractable complex genetic organisms for untangling complex hCoV-host interactions, and as pathogenesis models for preclinical evaluation of novel therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsCommunicable Diseases, EmergingCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsDisease Models, AnimalDisease SusceptibilityHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID30043100
PMCPMC6132729
OpenAlexW2884833234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.