Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30043086›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental nephrology2019

Influence of the intra-peritoneal segment of the swan neck peritoneal catheter on infectious and mechanical complications and technique survival.

Vanessa Burgugi Banin, Daniela Ponce, Dayana Bitencourt Dias, Rogério Carvalho de Oliveira, Luis Cuadrado Martin, Thyago Proença de Moraes, Pasqual Barretti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vanessa Burgugi BaninSão Paulo State University, UNESP, Rubião Junior District, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. dponce@fmb.unesp.br.
Daniela PonceSão Paulo State University, UNESP, Rubião Junior District, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dayana Bitencourt DiasSão Paulo State University, UNESP, Rubião Junior District, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rogério Carvalho de OliveiraSão Paulo State University, UNESP, Rubião Junior District, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luis Cuadrado MartinSão Paulo State University, UNESP, Rubião Junior District, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thyago Proença de MoraesSão Paulo State University, UNESP, Rubião Junior District, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pasqual BarrettiSão Paulo State University, UNESP, Rubião Junior District, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus about the preferable type of catheter for successful peritoneal dialysis. Intra- and extra-peritoneal catheter configuration may be associated with mechanical and infectious complications affecting technique survival. The objective of this study was to compare the mechanical and infectious complications of coiled versus straight swan neck (SN) peritoneal dialysis catheters.

methodsA prospective randomized trial was performed to compare mechanical (tip migration with dysfunction) and infectious (peritonitis and exit site infection) complications between catheters randomly divided into two groups: swan neck straight tip and swan neck coiled tip. The follow-up was 1 year.

resultsA total of 49 catheters, in 46 patients, were included from April 2015 to February 2016. The catheters groups were constituted as: 25 coiled tip SN and 24 straight tip SN. The baseline demographics were similar among the groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were not different for time to first exit site infection, peritonitis and time to first catheter tip migration (log-rank test, p = 0.07, p = 0.54 and p = 0.83, respectively). Catheter survival and method survival were also similar (log-rank p = 0.88 and p = 0.91, respectively).

conclusionsThe two types of intra-peritoneal segments of SN catheters studied presented similar infectious and mechanical rates with no differences in catheter and technique survival curve. These results were consistent with the recommendations of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Indexed as

AgedCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingEquipment FailureFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal DialysisPeritonitisProspective StudiesCatheter migrationPeritoneal dialysisPeritonitisSwan neck

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.