Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30043081›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2019

Post-extubation Dysphagia: Does Timing of Evaluation Matter?

Stevie Marvin, Susan Thibeault, William J Ehlenbach

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Postorotracheal intubation dysphagia in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Dysphagia outcomes in COVID-19 patients: experiences in long-term acute care hospital (LTACH).European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stevie MarvinDepartment of Surgery, Voice & Swallow Clinic, G3/2 Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. marvin@surgery.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2177-1747
Susan ThibeaultDepartment of Surgery, Voice & Swallow Clinic, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WIMR Building 1484, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
William J EhlenbachDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 1685 Highland Ave, MFCB 5230 MC2281, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swallowing evaluations are often delayed at least 24 h following extubation with the assumption that swallow function improves over time. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to determine if dysphagia, as measured by aspiration and need for diet modification, declines over the first 24-h post-extubation, whereby providing evidence-based evaluation guidelines for this population. Forty-nine patients completed FEES at 2-4 h post-extubation and 24-26 h post-extubation. We compared Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores and diet recommendation between time points. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to investigate associations between age, reason for admission, reason for intubation, and a history of COPD and outcomes of aspiration or silent aspiration at either FEES exam. Sixty-nine percent of participants safely swallowed at least one texture without aspiration at 2-4 h post-extubation. Within participants, there was a significant decrease in penetration/aspiration at 24 h and 79% showed improvement in airway protection on at least one bolus type, suggesting an improvement in swallow function over the first day following extubation. These findings suggest that although patients may be safe to begin a modified diet soon after extubation, delaying evaluation until 24-h post-extubation may allow for a less restricted diet.

Indexed as

Time FactorsAirway ExtubationDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRespiratory AspirationTime-to-TreatmentDeglutitionDeglutition disordersDysphagiaEndotracheal tubeICUIntubation

Identifiers

PMID30043081
OpenAlexW2884164921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.