Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30043078›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018

In vitro detection of common rhinosinusitis bacteria by the eNose utilising differential mobility spectrometry.

Jussi Virtanen, Lauri Hokkinen, Markus Karjalainen, Anton Kontunen, Risto Vuento, Jura Numminen, Markus Rautiainen, Niku Oksala, Antti Roine, Ilkka Kivekäs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jussi VirtanenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, PL 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland. jussi.virtanen@pshp.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-216X
Lauri HokkinenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, PL 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland.
Markus KarjalainenBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Anton KontunenBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Risto VuentoDepartment of Microbiology, Fimlab Laboratories Ltd, Tampere, Finland.
Jura NumminenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, PL 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland.
Markus RautiainenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, PL 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland.
Niku OksalaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Antti RoineDepartment of Surgery, Hatanpää Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Ilkka KivekäsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, PL 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FITampere University · FIFimlab (Finland) · FITampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is a sudden, symptomatic inflammation of the nasal and paranasal mucosa. It is usually caused by respiratory virus infection, but bacteria complicate for a small number of ARS patients. The differential diagnostics between viral and bacterial pathogens is difficult and currently no rapid methodology exists, so antibiotics are overprescribed. The electronic nose (eNose) has shown the ability to detect diseases from gas mixtures. Differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) is a next-generation device that can separate ions based on their different mobility in high and low electric fields. Five common rhinosinusitis bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were analysed in vitro with DMS. Classification was done using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and k-nearest neighbour (KNN). The results were validated using leave-one-out cross-validation and separate train and test sets. With the latter, 77% of the bacteria were classified correctly with LDA. The comparative figure with KNN was 79%. In one train-test set, P. aeruginosa was excluded and the four most common ARS bacteria were analysed with LDA and KNN; the correct classification rate was 83 and 85%, respectively. DMS has shown its potential in detecting rhinosinusitis bacteria in vitro. The applicability of DMS needs to be studied with rhinosinusitis patients.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseAcute DiseaseGram-Negative Aerobic Rods and CocciHaemophilus influenzaeHumansRhinitisSinusitisSpectrum AnalysisStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniaeAcute rhinosinusitisDifferential mobility spectrometryElectronic noseeNose

Identifiers

PMID30043078
OpenAlexW2883107135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.