ArticleMethodsX2018
A method package for electrophysiological evaluation of reconstructed or regenerated facial nerves in rodents.
Article in MethodsX, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dose-Dependent Effects of Minocycline on Facial Nerve Regeneration: A Microscopic and Molecular Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Recording Vibrissal Compound Muscle Action Potentials Following Facial Nerve Trunk Stimulation in Rats Using a BIOPAC System.Journal of audiology & otology · 2026Article
- Facial neuromuscular junctions and brainstem nuclei are the target of tetanus neurotoxin in cephalic tetanus.JCI insight · 2023Article
- An electrophysiological evaluation method for the ovine facial nerve.Regenerative therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recording via reconstructed or regenerated motor axons is a critical examination to evaluate newly developed surgical and regeneration techniques. However, there is currently no documentation on technical aspects of CMAP recordings via reconstructed or regenerated facial nerves. We have studied new techniques of plastic surgery and nerve regeneration using a rat facial nerve defect model for years, standardizing an evaluation pipeline using CMAP recordings. Here we describe our CMAP recording procedure in detail as a package including surgical preparation, data acquisition, analysis and troubleshooting. Each resource is available in public repositories and is maintained as a version control system. In addition, we demonstrate that our analytical pipeline can not only be applied to rats, but also mice. Finally, we show that CMAP recordings can be practically combined with other behavioral and anatomical examinations. For example, retrograde motor neuron labeling provides anatomical evidence for physical routes between the facial motor nucleus and its periphery through reconstructed or regenerated facial nerves, in addition to electrophysiological evidence by CMAP recordings from the same animal. •
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.