Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30042895›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

Advertisement call of

Marcos R Bornschein, Luiz Fernando Ribeiro, Mario M Rollo, André E Confetti, Marcio R Pie

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A new species ofPeerJ · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcos R BornscheinInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Fernando RibeiroMater Natura - Instituto de Estudos Ambientais, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Mario M RolloInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7987-5800
André E ConfettiUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Marcio R PieMater Natura - Instituto de Estudos Ambientais, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2949-4871
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsWe analyzed 34 advertisement calls from 20 individuals of

resultsDISCUSSION: Individuals increase the complexity of their calls as they proceed, incorporating note groups and pulses per note. Intra-individual variation analysis also demonstrated that less structured advertisement calls (i.e., with notes with fewer pulses) are not stereotyped. It is possible that isolated notes and note groups could have distinct functions, perhaps territorial defense and mating, respectively. We argue that using a note-centered approach facilitates comparisons with calls of congeners, as well as underscores the considerable differences in call structure between species in a single group and among species groups.

Indexed as

BioacousticsBrachycephalus albolineatusCall functionNote-centered approachSpecies groups

Identifiers

PMID30042895
PMCPMC6055690
OpenAlexW2772611042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.