Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30042893›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

Cross-species screening of microsatellite markers for individual identification of snow petrel

Anant Pande, Nidhi Rawat, Kuppusamy Sivakumar, Sambandam Sathyakumar, Vinod B Mathur, Samrat Mondol

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anant Pande *Endangered Species Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Nidhi Rawat *Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Kuppusamy SivakumarEndangered Species Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Sambandam SathyakumarEndangered Species Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Vinod B MathurWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Samrat MondolAnimal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Wildlife Institute of India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seabirds are important indicators of marine ecosystem health. Species within the order Procellariiformes are the most abundant seabird species group distributed from warm tropical to cold temperate regions including Antarctica. There is a paucity of information on basic biology of the pelagic seabird species nesting on the Antarctic continents, and long-term studies are required to gather data on their population demography, genetics and other ecological parameters. Under the 'Biology and Environmental Sciences' component of the Indian Antarctic programme, long-term monitoring of Antarctic biodiversity is being conducted. In this paper, we describe results of cross-species screening of a panel of 12 and 10 microsatellite markers in two relatively little studied seabird species in Antarctica, the snow petrel

Indexed as

Antarctic seabirdsGenetic diversityGenetic monitoringProcellariiformes

Identifiers

PMID30042893
PMCPMC6055593
OpenAlexW2883529031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.