ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2018
The Sussex-Waterloo Scale of Hypnotizability (SWASH): measuring capacity for altering conscious experience.
Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel method for rubber hand illusion strength measurement based on inverse multidimensional scaling.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- The Japanese version of the Phenomenological Control Scale.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025Article
- Intimate relationships and hypnosis: insecure adult attachment affects emotions and absorption during hypnosis.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Real-time assessment of hypnotic depth, using an EEG-based brain-computer interface: a preliminary study.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- The influence of experience and modality of presentation (online vs. offline) on hypnotizability.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Demand characteristics challenge effects in embodiment and presence.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Strategies that reduce Stroop interference.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- The rubber hand illusion is accompanied by a distributed reduction of alpha and beta power in the EEG.PloS one · 2022Article
- Multisensory Integration Dominates Hypnotisability and Expectations in the Rubber Hand Illusion.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Intrinsic neural activity predisposes susceptibility to a body illusion.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022Article
- Hypothesis awareness confounds asynchronous control conditions in indirect measures of the rubber hand illusion.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Trait phenomenological control predicts experience of mirror synaesthesia and the rubber hand illusion.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Can hypnotic suggestibility be measured online?Psychological research · 2020Article
- Time perception and the experience of agency in meditation and hypnosis.PsyCh journal · 2019Review
- Best Practice Recommendations for Conducting and Reporting Controlled Trials in Clinical Hypnosis Research.Journal of evidence-based integrative medicineReview
- Hypnosis at the Crossroads: A Primer of the Past and Visions for the Future.The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosisReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to respond to hypnotic suggestibility (hypnotizability) is a stable trait which can be measured in a standardized procedure consisting of a hypnotic induction and a series of hypnotic suggestions. The SWASH is a 10-item adaptation of an established scale, the Waterloo-Stanford Group C Scale of Hypnotic Suggestibility (WSGC). Development of the SWASH was motivated by three distinct aims: to reduce required screening time, to provide an induction which more accurately reflects current theoretical understanding and to supplement the objective scoring with experiential scoring. Screening time was reduced by shortening the induction, removing two suggestions which may cause distress (dream and age regression) and by modifications which allow administration in lecture theatres, so that more participants can be screened simultaneously. Theoretical issues were addressed by removing references to sleep, absorption and eye fixation and closure. Data from 418 participants at the University of Sussex and the Lancaster University are presented, along with data from 66 participants who completed a retest screening. The subjective and objective scales were highly correlated. The subjective scale showed good reliability and objective scale reliability was comparable to the WSGC. The addition of subjective scale responses to the post-hypnotic suggestion (PHS) item suggested a high probability that responses to PHS are inflated in WSGC screening. The SWASH is an effective measure of hypnotizability, which reflects changes in conscious experience and presents practical and theoretical advantages over existing scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.