Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30042652›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space.

Cara E Van Uden, Samuel A Nastase, Andrew C Connolly, Ma Feilong, Isabella Hansen, M Ida Gobbini, James V Haxby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cara E Van UdenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
Samuel A NastaseDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
Andrew C ConnollyDepartment of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
Ma FeilongDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
Isabella HansenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
M Ida GobbiniDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
James V HaxbyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.

Funding

Analysis of Multi-Voxel Patterns of Activity in fMRI dataR01MH075706 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI HAXBY, JAMES V · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
A similarity-based approach for decoding the human object recognition pathwayF32MH085433 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CONNOLLY, ANDREW C · 2009 to 2011
$162k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH085433NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH075706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encoding models for mapping voxelwise semantic tuning are typically estimated separately for each individual, limiting their generalizability. In the current report, we develop a method for estimating semantic encoding models that generalize across individuals. Functional MRI was used to measure brain responses while participants freely viewed a naturalistic audiovisual movie. Word embeddings capturing agent-, action-, object-, and scene-related semantic content were assigned to each imaging volume based on an annotation of the film. We constructed both conventional within-subject semantic encoding models and between-subject models where the model was trained on a subset of participants and validated on a left-out participant. Between-subject models were trained using cortical surface-based anatomical normalization or surface-based whole-cortex hyperalignment. We used hyperalignment to project group data into an individual's unique anatomical space via a common representational space, thus leveraging a larger volume of data for out-of-sample prediction while preserving the individual's fine-grained functional-anatomical idiosyncrasies. Our findings demonstrate that anatomical normalization degrades the spatial specificity of between-subject encoding models relative to within-subject models. Hyperalignment, on the other hand, recovers the spatial specificity of semantic tuning lost during anatomical normalization, and yields model performance exceeding that of within-subject models.

Indexed as

fMRIforward encoding modelsfunctional alignmenthyperalignmentindividual variabilitynatural visionsemantic representation

Identifiers

PMID30042652
PMCPMC6048235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.